Crawford's ATG ranking: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Ioakeim Tzortzakis, Dec 28, 2025.


  1. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis "The David Haye of Loma's Gay" -Edgar Allan Poe Full Member

    2,072
    7,309
    Aug 27, 2020
    Odd how a thread like this hasn't been made yet, where Bud's specific historical ranking is assessed. So far it's mostly been direct comparisons to Floyd. So yeah, where does he belong historically ? I'll give my take, and then we can all discuss it.

    THE UGLY = Opposition

    This is where Bud gets most flack. "He hasn't beaten anyone, It's just Canelo and Spence". Well not quite that bad, but the spirit of it is right.

    135:

    His first win over a ranked fighter at LW was the #3 ranked Ricky Burns. Bud, alongside many of his current era contemporaries like Usyk and Loma, got given a title shot without having beaten a single ranked fighter beforehand. Not a bad thing on its own, but he's not beating the allegations with this, especially if said LW era is one of the worst ever. No hidden great win to be found here.

    Burns is as pedestrian as they come. You wouldn't even mention him if he was on Carlos Ortiz's resume. Only 5 of Burns' career wins were over top 10 ranked Boxers. Doesn't sound too bad until you learn 2 of them came from 130 in Nicky Crook (a former 126er) and Roman Martinez (known for losing to Loma, Gamboa and only beating Salido). Then at 135 where he fought Bud ? A shopworn Katsidis, Kevin Mitchell (who never beat anyone), and Paulus Moses whose only good win is an 130 lber, Cassius Baloyi. Burns did win a strap at 140 later, but it was a vacant belt won by defeating another unranked fighter. It's ugly.

    Then we've got Yuriorkis Gamboa, one of Bud's top 5 wins. Known for being an underachiever, but he was a good, solid fighter. Wins over Salido, Solis, De Leon and later Sosa and Martinez. He got some stuff done. But, and this is a big but, he was far from an elite Lightweight. He was a Featherweight. After the Leon win, he moved up to 130 to get an interim belt by beating the unranked Farenas, and then immediately moved up to Lightweight for yet another interim title by beating the unranked Perez. He hadn't even proved himself at 130 vs a world class fighter, let alone at 135 where he fought Bud. It's why he wasn't ranked at the weight.

    So how did Gamboa rebound at 135 after Bud beat him black and blue ? He didn't. He got stopped in 7 by the unranked Robinson Castellanos, and then more famously by Tank, Haney and Cruz when he was old. And even then, at 130 he only managed to prove himself with a SD win vs Sosa and then Martinez. And let's be honest, they're nothing fighters. I've said that when talking about Loma's wins over them as well.

    Crawford then beat the #2 ranked Raymundo Beltran to become the lineal LW champion, prior to leaving the division for good. And Beltran is also just not that good. He got punked with that draw vs Burns, but c'mon, it's Ricky Burns. He has nothing else going for him, aside from that win over Paulus Moses when both of them were past it, I guess. He was there for a brief moment in time and disappeared just as quickly.

    140:

    We're starting off with a win over the #10 rated Thomas Dulorme for a vacant WBO strap......Yeah, **** that. Dulorme's only win over a fighter that was ever ranked in his life is over Demarcus Corley. The one that was already reduced to a journeyman who was losing to everyone who owned a pair of gloves.

    Then Dierry Jean, who was unranked. Then Hank Lundy, who was also unranked. Then it's the #1 rated Viktor Postol. Finally some good ****in...

    is what I'd say if Postol didn't only have 2 wins worth ****. One being Selcuk Aydin, whose sole win over a (formerly) rated fighter is the 39-20 Demarcus Corley. In fact, Postol fought also Corley right before Aydin, making Corley one of Postol's 3 wins over opponents who were ever rated in their life. The remaining fighter being Postol's best win, the ATG known as Lucas Matthhyse. The same Matthyse who lost to all his best opponents, a washed Zab Judah (who even loses to Judah ?), Dexon Alexander, Danny Garcia etc. The same Matthyse whose 2 best wins are Lamont Peterson and Ruslan Provodnikov.

    So which great fighters did Crawford fight after Postol ? John Molina of course! Who after doing jack his whole career, managed to beat Ruslan Provodkinov. And how good is Provodnikov ? So great that his 2 best wins are Jose Luis Castillo in Castillo's very last fight, and Mike Alvardo, whose only win vs a ranked fighter is Brandon Rios, in the rematch of a trilogy he would lose. That's it.

    Then Crawford beat the unranked Felix Diaz. Then the #7 rated Julius Indongo. He held the IBF and WBA titles, so he must have been really good right ? Nah, there's a reason a unified champ is ranked 7th by the ring. And it's that he only has 2 wins over rated fighters, the ones he got his titles from. The first one being Ricky burns, who if you recall has actually never beaten anyone ranked at 140 and got his WBA belt via vacancy politics. The other being Eduard Troyanovsky, whom he impressively KO'd in 1 to get the IBF title. But Eduard himself got it from Cesar Cuenca, who was so highly thought of that despite holding one of the 4 belts, was never top 10 ranked by The Ring.

    147:

    Jeff Horn (#8): It's Horn. Got a gift vs old Pac, then lost to Bud, then lost to the mediocre Zerafa before scraping by for an MD win revenge, then he got stopped by Tim Tzyu. His only non controversial and somewhat noteworthy win is that KO1 over the ghost of Mundine.

    Jose Benavidez Jr: lol

    Amir Khan (unranked at the time): Beyond washed. Even by Canelo, he had a whole TV stint in 2017. He was having his Jack Johnson tour after the Jeffries bout by the time Bud got to him.

    Egidijus Kavaliauskas (#7): His only noteworthy win is David Avanesyan who was still at the domestic level. Paper thin.

    Kell Brook (unranked): Basically as washed as Khan, though technically a bit better since he beat Khan for his final fight 2 years later. The only fight he had after Crawford, btw.

    Shawn Porter (#5): Basically Gamboa if he actually belonged in the same division as Crawford. Wins over Ugas, Garcia, Broner Berto, Alexander make for a solid overall resume. Not HoF worthy, but probably Bud's 3rd best win.

    David Avanesyan (#7): A mid level fighter, his best win is the domestic level Josh Kelly. Only thing he's got besides Kelly is 45 year old Mosley in his last fight. His loss to Lamont Peterson doesn't excite me either, as he has never really shown himself to be world class.

    Errol Spence jr (#1): This is the big one. Spence has been up to this point the best opponent Bud has beaten. He was P4P top 5 at the time, and had beaten Shawn Porter, Mickey Garcia, Danny Garcia, Kell Brook, Yordenis Ugas and Lamont Peterson to solidfy his claim as the best Welterweight in the world by that point. But, there's the car crash.

    Now, do I think the crash took something out of Spence ? Yes. It was a brutal and potentially life threatening crash that guarantees an athlete's career will never be the same. But, do I think he was some zombie that was dragged out of bed as some have made him out to be ? No. It would simply be baffling to me that actual professionals would clear Spence to fight if his health was in such genuine danger. He did look odd in his next fights, but he won in the end. No matter how you look at it, he was the best Welterweight in the world aside from Bud. He was beaten easily.

    154:

    Madrimov. He was thought of as perhaps the best in the world at the time. It's clear now that he isn't after he lost to Bud and Vergil Ortiz back to back. And no matter how you slice it, he's just plain unproven. Sorry but a win over Michel Soro and Murgamov does not make you elite. He has promise, but he has done absolutely nothing to prove his quality as a fighter. Giving Crawford a tough fight in a divison he had just entered for the first time, in his 2nd to last fight at 37 years old means nothing to me. Neither does stinking the joint vs Ortiz. I was with my mates at the time, waiting to see Bivol vs Beterbiev 2, and we had ordered burgers to munch on, waiting for Shakur's fight to be over. Turns out we ended up eating them for Madrimov vs Ortiz instead.

    168:

    And now the ginger man himself, Canelo. Far and away the best fighter Bud has faced and beaten historically. He holds wins over GGG, Jacobs, Cotto, Lara, Khan, Kovalev, Smith(s), Plant, Saunders, Chavez jr, Charlo, Trout and Mosley, throughout varying points in their careers. 4 division champion, and has been world class for nearly 12 years now. In fact, he was P4P top 10 for ten years straight.

    He's also been been a pro for 20 years, and has 68 fights under his belt, which is a lot for the modern era. Lots of wear and tear. Really, he was never the same after Bivol beat him in 2021, with all his next 6 fights going the distance vs fighters that really shouldn't be surviving him. Worst of all was the Scull fight, where he almost like Tyson did vs Jake Paul.

    But let us not forget the size difference here. Crawford while a huge weight cutter, was still a Welterweight since 2018 who moved up 2 divisions and 21 lbs to face Canelo. It was even clear in the Madrimov fight, that perhaps Bud was starting to feel the size difference. And while he did bulk up for Canelo and looked near the same size, it felt artificial. Simply put, I don't feel as if ginger can ever move down again. Bud could. And while Canelo is older in terms of Boxing years, Bud is still the older man by 3 years. And while you can point out to the Scull performance, it's clear to me that Canelo took that fight lightly and came in much better form vs Crawford. Still not a prime Canelo, but there were glimpses.

    Moving up as he did at 38, and beating arguably the greatest fighter of the post MayPac era, even if past it, is very great.

    Overall: Yeah, it is bad. It's not just Canelo and Spence, but it's not far from it. His top wins are Canelo, Spence, Porter, Postol and Gamboa. Not the worst thing in the world, but SRL's wins over the Fab 4, it is not.
     
  2. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis "The David Haye of Loma's Gay" -Edgar Allan Poe Full Member

    2,072
    7,309
    Aug 27, 2020
    THE GOOD = Other achievements

    And now, the stuff that does not have to do with opposition. The rest of his achievements.

    First of all, he's the only 3 division undisputed champion in the 4 belt era. That's huge, more so than you think. He was the first undisputed champion in 2 divisions too, at 140 and 147, but Usyk and Inoue caught up and did the same with CW-HW and 118-122. So he said "**** you" to both of them, moved up to 154 for 1 strap, skipped 160 entirely, and beat the face of Boxing for 3 time undisputed glory.

    Usyk has reached his ceiling with HW so there's no way he manages x3 undisputed, and I doubt Inoue manages to unify all of 126 either (possible, but doubtful, he's 4 months away from 33 and probably starting to decline). Bud might very well remain the only one. Almost certainly the only one who skipped unifying the 2 divisions (or even skipped in competing in one of them) above his best one, and unified the one above them instead.

    Also, he's the only former Lightweight champion to become Super Middleweight champion. The only one. Duran and Oscar became champs at 160 by beating Barkley and Sturm respectively, the only Lightweights to do so. Crawford took it a step further and became Super Middleweight champ (and again, while skipping 160 entirely), not against some title holder who was there for a moment like Barkley or Sturm, but against THE man at Super Middleweight, one of the top 5 or so ever at the weight (it's a tweener division to be fair, but still). In a way, he has rendered both Duran and Oscar obsolete.

    Oh yeah, and he's one of the 6 men to ever become champions in 5 divisions. Alongside Pacquiao, Oscar, Floyd, Leonard and Hearns. And unlike Leonard who basically cheated in doing it, by gaining both the 168 and 175 titles in one fight, Crawford skipped 160 entirely. That is nuts, no matter how you look at it.

    THE BAD: The actual journey to undisputed

    There is one downside to this whole thing. And it's that Bud's actual journey to undisputed glory was easy and lacked all around challenge. 140 was terrible and empty. He had to beat the #10 rated Dulorme for a vacant WBO belt, and had to beat the #7 Indongo (who also sucks) for the WBA and IBF belts. Postol was a good fighter, but he was far from great, certainly not on the level to make the 140 run worth it. He had to beat 1 good fighter for the WBC belt and 2 bad ones for the rest of the belts.

    Then at 147, he only had to beat Horn for the WBO belt, then just waited for Spence to do all the hard work (beating Porter, Brook and Ugas for the WBC, WBA and IBF belts) before fighting him. The Spence win is impressive, but the actual journey to gaining all the belts wasn't. And obviously at 168, he only had to beat Canelo for all the belts. 3 time undisputed glory is great, but it came easy to him. He had to beat 5 people for it. 2 of them sucked, 1 was simply solid, and only 2 of them were the real deal. It's also why I don't give him too many points for undefeated compared to say, Marciano or Mayweather, who had to work for it more.

    So, where does he rank ?
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2025
    Bokaj, Noel857, Mastrangelo and 4 others like this.
  3. Mastrangelo

    Mastrangelo Active Member Full Member

    1,285
    1,965
    Feb 19, 2019
    About right.
    His resume is very underwhelming. It's not his fault for a large part. When He was at 135 and then 140, the divisions were in a bit of a low, lacking real talent and it's not revisionist, many fans were pointing this out at the time.

    As He moved up to 147, there were couple very good fighters for him to fight - but there was that famed "side of the street" issue, with PBC rarely working with other promoters. Thus, He fought Horn and then had to wait couple years before Porter made a stand with Haymon and decided to fight Bud on ESPN, largely because He already fought everyone else at this point. Then He finally got the fight with Spence, but it was when most believed Errol had his best days behid him.

    Yet, it's not Wladimir Klitschko's fault either that He didn't have the same opponents that other Heavyweight champions had in other eras, so it is what it is.
    Bud also could've fought Ennis, where the win had a great chance of growing even after He retired. Same with Ortiz Jr. Bud was older, it would've made things hard for him against young up-and-comers, but if You want to be great - You have to do great things.

    Canelo at 168 probably was one truly outstanding individual win, even with Saul being past his best years.. but it is just one win and I also tend to not give as much value to fighters moving up through the weights today, in comparision to the old timers.
    With the knowledge and access to expert advicers in regards to diet and resistance training, I think it's pretty obvious that effectively gaining weight is something that has gotten much easier. Guys can move through multiple divisions and never look small, They just adjust their frame to the next division. As Crawford said in JRE podcat I believe, "As I move up in weight, the weight moves up on me".

    I would add one more "Good" thing which I think is worth mentioning about his career. He's been extremely dominant. I don't think there's other undefeated ATG which does not have single questionable win. Floyd has Castillo I, I often heard about Marciano and LaStarza, Andre Ward has Kovalev I, Calzaghe has Reid and Hopkins.
    For Bud, closest fight was probably Madrimov - but I still think it was pretty clear cut at the end. So that is very impressive to be some consistent for over 10 years, leaving no doubts in the ring.


    As for where He stands.. After The Ring published their list of top 10 greatest fighters of the last 25 years, I made one myself:
    1. Manny Pacquiao
    2. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
    3. Juan Manuel Marquez
    4. Oleksandr Usyk
    5. Saul "Canelo" Alvarez
    6. Wladimir Klitshko
    7. Bernard Hopkins
    8. Roman Gonzalez
    9. Terence Crawford
    10. Marco Antonio Barrera

    I might adjust it after couple years, with time possibly giving new perspective, but that's about where I see him right now - and that's not even taking into consideration what happend before 2000, where some of the guys mentioned built large portions of their resumes.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  4. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,715
    12,387
    Mar 19, 2012
    The other element with Crawford's resume are these guys
    Mikey Garcia
    Danny Garcia
    Keith Thurman
    Charlo
    Pacquiao

    Manny should get a pass because of his age as well that we know he fought everyone through much of his career.

    The other 4 wanted to fight Crawford about as much as they wanted Polio. They ducked him but if they had fought him. For example Garcia at 140, Thurman at 147 and Charlo at 154.

    Those 3 names would have filled his resume to look better on paper. Except they were able to avoid him. Keith basically retired Charlo ran for the hills, Danny Garcia never considered fighting Crawford.

    Spence almost ended up with that group. Bud was able to get him away from Haymon and talk to him. He had enough pride not to do what they did.
     
  5. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,116
    6,168
    Jan 6, 2024
    Crawford has 12 wins against 140+ world champions. Jean is one of the better fighters to not win a world title in the 4 belt era.

    Theres no question Crawford failed to clean out the division at 140. But is this really his fault? He was there 7 fights and unified the belts. He faced 4 top 10 guys during that time. Postol and Indongo were the champs and the WBO had him fight Dulorme for their belt. When Crawford left the division Taylor, Prograis and Ramirez had the WBC Silver, NABF and WBC Continental Americas belts. Of those 3 Prograis was rated the highest at the time and Crawford had already beaten 2 NABF champs in Jean and Dulorme. Prograis and Ramirez got their title shots shortly after and Taylor(the best of the 3) had to wait until 2019.

    At the end of 2017 the Ring had Taylor, Prograis and Ramirez ranked 4,8,10. Mikey Garcia was ranked 1st. Crawford only fought twice at 140 after 2016 and at this time of those 4 only Prograis was ranked in the top 10(6th). At that same time(end of 2016) Postol, Indongo and Ricky Burns were all in the top 7. That 2nd group isn't better then the first group but that is hindsight.

    At WW Crawford is 8-0 with 8 knockouts against 7 world champs and an NABF/EBU double winner who was both undefeateted and in the top 10 at the time Crawford fought him. Mayweathers 12-0. Above 135 Mayweathers lead is 18-0 to 17-0. If you throw in LW Crawford actually is ahead with Mayweathers margin coming from 130 and south. Mayweather fought more champs the whole way through but its closer then one would think.

    Crawford is in the shadow of Mayweathers era but Brook, Khan and Porter were all ranked in the WW top 6 when Floyd retired and are among the biggest omissions from Floyds resume that he very reasonably could have fought instead of Berto. But IMO Porter Brook and perhaps Khan are all IBHOF level guys. They are certainly more deserving than Gatti.
     
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,597
    20,145
    Apr 3, 2012
    It’s not a good, bad ugly type of career. More like a good, great, and unreal type of career.

    The only downside is that he could’ve been near Floyd and Manny in terms of resume if given the same opportunities. His head to head level was right between them imo.
     
    themaster458 likes this.
  7. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,717
    46,629
    Mar 3, 2019
    I think he's getting overrated. To me, his resume prior to 2023 was terrible. Postol and Porter are good fighters but historically, they're just footnotes. Spence is a good win but compromised in some ways, and Canelo is a great win but not as great as others are making out.

    Canelo wasn't actually much bigger than Bud, despite the actual weight jump (it's about 5lbs, on the night); and it shows. Canelo has really been calling the curtains on his career for the last few years now - having not really been an interesting force in boxing since losing to Bivol. Poor performances, poor opponents and a lack of ambition has plagued Canelo recently and his form has reflected this imo. It's a great win (and achievement to be 3x undisputed) coz Canelo is a great fighter, and Crawford schooled him; but it's definitely not one of the greatest wins of all-time imo (not top 10 or 15, I mean).

    I wouldn't have Crawford top 100 for greatness as of now. Maybe in a few years I'll revisit him, but I just don't see it. He's about on the same level as guys like Marquez or Barrera for me. He's got 2 very good wins and 3/4 good-mid wins - outside of that, he's got some weird weight jumping stuff, a bunch of meaningless titles and the 3x Weight Undisputed.

    And while yes, 3x undisputed is undeniably insane today - look at who he actually beat for those titles. Dulorme, Postol & Indongo at 140; Horn & Spence at 147 and Canelo at 168. Spence and Canelo did most (or all) of the work for him at 147 & 168 in terms of unifying; and the only division in which Crawford unified them himself was absolutely and utterly terrible. Despite being undisputed in 3x weights, I wouldn't consider Crawford's weight/title achievements much better - if at all - than someone like DLH (who also probably wouldn't make my top 100).
     
  8. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,717
    46,629
    Mar 3, 2019
    We got 2 fights of unreal, 2 fights of good and everything else was either bad or ugly.
     
  9. Mastrangelo

    Mastrangelo Active Member Full Member

    1,285
    1,965
    Feb 19, 2019
    I don't even know if it's top 50. I find Mosley's win over peak Oscar far more impressive. Same with Pacman's first win over Barrera. Just two from the top of my head and in recent history. Canelo was clearly up for the taking.
     
  10. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,717
    46,629
    Mar 3, 2019
    I had a little think of a few wins from this century which I think are better, and the ones I come out with were:

    Marquez vs Pac IV
    Morales vs Pacquiao
    Mayweather vs Pac
    Mayweather vs Canelo
    Hopkins vs Tarver
    Jones vs Ruiz
    Rungvisai vs Chocolatito
     
    roughdiamond and JohnThomas1 like this.
  11. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,597
    20,145
    Apr 3, 2012
    Go DM him that. Or waddle up to him at an autograph signing and tell him that.

    He was unreal against Spence, Postol, and Canelo. He was great for everything else pretty much.
     
  12. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,717
    46,629
    Mar 3, 2019
    It seems like you've misunderstood what forums are for.
     
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,597
    20,145
    Apr 3, 2012
    Everyone knew Jones was going to beat Ruiz. Interesting how you didn’t put in Tarver knocking out Jones.
     
  14. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    29,597
    20,145
    Apr 3, 2012
    Pernell Whitaker wishes he could’ve had Bud’s career.
     
  15. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,717
    46,629
    Mar 3, 2019
    There's another great example.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.