CRICKEY--- Khans at it again !!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by friend of frank, Jun 11, 2012.


  1. friend of frank

    friend of frank Member Full Member

    124
    0
    May 7, 2012
    just when i thought id heard the last of Khan being robbed by the super human steroid fuelled lamont peterson , he has started about it again comparing his loss to the pacquio V bradley decision.... one week he lost to a super human peterson now he totally outboxed him.
    i think khan is a massive talent but he is thick as **** and should be prepped on what to say !
     
  2. Jared

    Jared Active Member Full Member

    1,428
    1
    Apr 17, 2010
    Both fights were close and could have gone either way.
     
  3. Scottrf

    Scottrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,547
    0
    May 1, 2010
    I had Khan by a point to be fair, but he isn't the most media-savvy.
     
  4. friend of frank

    friend of frank Member Full Member

    124
    0
    May 7, 2012
    i had it a draw without the 2 point deduction.. it was a good close fight... not comparable to the manny v bradley fight
     
  5. BlackBrenny

    BlackBrenny Guest

    I had both Peterson and Pacquiao winning comfortably, the difference between Khan and Pacquiao is that Pacquiaos punches were actually landing
     
  6. BoxerGaz

    BoxerGaz East Side Boxing VIP Full Member

    3,817
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    I had the Khan fight way closer than I did with Pac/Bradley
     
  7. Big N Bad

    Big N Bad Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,990
    12
    Nov 29, 2007
    its no secret the guys stupid. i remember his dad was asked by a reporter "who taught ur son how to be with the fans and media" and his dad responded very proudly with the shah khan grin "himself...he taught himself...he's just like the lads"

    LMAO!!!

    good boxer but he's as thick as a brick
     
  8. Ilesey

    Ilesey ~ Full Member

    38,201
    2,598
    Jul 22, 2004
    Thick. As. ****.
     
  9. I TuCKeR 93 I

    I TuCKeR 93 I New Member Full Member

    8
    0
    Feb 28, 2010
    Khan is a poor mans naz
     
  10. Scottrf

    Scottrf Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,547
    0
    May 1, 2010
    Why do you compare him to Naz?
     
  11. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    No Khan's could have went either way and you are obviously a ***** who hasn't seen Pac vs. Bradley if you think that could have went either way (and I thought Marquez beat Pacquiao twice.)
     
  12. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,266
    2,207
    Apr 25, 2008
    This.
     
  13. mithffg

    mithffg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,816
    167
    Feb 22, 2007
    He's a borderline ******
     
  14. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    6
    Dec 5, 2006
    I know one thing, Khan against a steroid enhance Peterson, looked like a fighter who was more accurate and can do more damage offensively than both Bradley and Pacman.

    Khan would beat both of them guys, dare I say it? Easy.

    He would stopped Bradley.
     
  15. Go Getta

    Go Getta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,444
    0
    Sep 9, 2011
    How dare you say that, it's not the ESB way...