It's not looking good for KillSomething. He's had to take a break from the pounding he's had. Maybe he'll return tomorrow?
The statement he made about being too young to witness Roy fans says it all. He wasn't even watching boxing back then. So many talk of beating Toney like it was nothing... I was only 11 years old, but remember it like it was yesterday, and how big of a risk that was for Roy.
While I agree with most of what you said, I don't agree that the first Tarver fight was a robbery. Jones dug down deep and exhibited more heart than I ever recall him showing at any point when he edged Tarver out over the championship rounds to win that first fight (I had it even going into the 11th). But much of what you say is true, and the fact that DM was inexplicably stripped of 2 titles for political reasons is something that always gets Jones fans grouchy and defensive. But your opening nailed it for me. Roy broke the mold of champions like the greats from the 80s who actually sought out the best fights, the important fights, and the legacy fights. Jones had the power to make the DM fight the same way Floyd has always had the power to make the Pac fight for all these years. Jones and DM held titles simultaneously for 6 or 7 years, and it's disgraceful that they never fought in the same way that it's disgraceful the type of stuff degenerates like Pac and Floyd have subjected fans to, using them for their gullibility and making millions off them without a care in the world. I'm not saying Jones is the only one to blame for a fight between him and DM happening, and I'm not saying that Floyd is the only one to blame for the fight between him and Pac not happening. Pac and DM share plenty of blame. But Floyd and Roy are/were the A-side, and they were the ones with the power to make the fights if they wanted them. They didn't. They chose the path of least resistance, and put business over legacy. I can't blame either for that, but as boxing fans it sucks when the best fighters don't seek the fights that should definitely be made. In that sense, I do believe RJJ largely paved the way for the pathetic state of boxing today.
:smoke In his prime may well have been the GREATEST AT ANY WEIGHT ? His style and physical attributes simply didn't allow longevity :deal
Everything he did, though, is suspect. He's in the same boat as guys like Mark McGwire from baseball, or Shane Mosley and James Toney in boxing, or even Margarito. He was an amazing talent, and obviously the thread starter is trolling to a large extent, but much of what he said was true (or partially true). Roy may have been the most gifted athlete ever to grace the squared circle. But it was frustrating to watch him when he did seem content avoiding perceived challenges when there were so few around who could test him.
Roy tried to secure better fights. How did he have the power to make the Dariusz fight? He didn't want to get robbed in Germany. It wasn't Roy's fault that Dariusz got stripped of two titles. Roy already had the WBC, and then he fought Del Valle and Reggie to unify. Roy wasn't going to go to Germany, because Dariusz had been hard done to. Look at things from Roy's perspective. Rightly or wrongly, he had the three main belts around his waist during negotiations. He was the best fighter in the world with all of the belts. Dariusz had the lightly regarded WBO belt. So he didn't have to travel. He held all the cards. But Kerry Davis of HBO did try his best to bring Dariusz to the U.S. But it wasn't to be. Roy didn't choose the path of least resistance.
He did not seem content to avoid challenges. Read the thread in it's entirety, with the links and videos that have been uploaded.
If Roy didn't choose the path of least resistance, he certainly never dared to be great in the mold of a Hagler or Hearns. I said there was plenty of blame to go around, both with Roy-DM and with Floyd-Pac. But it wasn't just about DM. Roy could have been so much better if he just sought out tougher challenges. He was a businessman first, and compared to Floyd, he was a poor businessman at that. He wasn't about legacy except usually in shallow senses, like "winning a heavyweight title" - where he captured an alphabet title from the weakest heavyweight champion around at that time. It was a good win for Roy, to be sure. I thought it would have made a lot of sense at that time for Roy to go for unification with Byrd.
I've read them, and I've been reading these debates back since the days where RJJ vs Jirov seemed like a possibility way back when. For all of his talent, don't you think it's a shame that Roy never secured a lineal crown in any division? That he never fought his biggest rival? That he tested positive for banned substances along with opponent Richard Hall, tainting his whole career? That the Hopkins rematch never came to be after the Middleweight tournament, when Roy was banking on a money fight with Tito? (A fight they still ridiculously made years later, after Tito was white-washed by Winky, incidentally). That he never tested himself at cruiser when there were potentially good fights to be made there?
I dont get all the hate RJJ gets. yes in his later years he got f()cked up a lot. But in his prime he was great to watch for anyone to aspire to be able to fight like that. Alas the same can be said for many other fighters through other generations..it just so happened to be my generation that we saw the best from RJJ and many more around his weight division at his peak.
Life is defined by circumstances and opportunities. Hagler and Hearns had the opportunities, and the opponents. One of the biggest disappointments of Roy's career, was his early MW days. Big Roy wrapped him in cotton wool, and he wouldn't let him fight anyone relevant, despite the brutal regime that he'd put him through on a daily basis, when he was younger. It was bizarre. He literally beat him with lengths of pipe, and turned him into a fighting machine. Yet he wouldn't let him of the leash. He hid title shots from Roy, that Fred Levin had offered. Julian Jackson is on record as saying that big Roy wouldn't let Roy fight him. In the end, Roy couldn't take it anymore. But by the time he'd broken free, he'd missed all of the great potential fights at MW. When Nunn, McCallum, Toney, McClellan, Jackson and Johnson were all fighting each other, Roy was being made to fight the Lester Yardbrough's of the world. Here's the Beyond the Glory documentary, where Fred Levin states that Big Roy hid title shots from him. Go to 17 mins, 30. http://youtu.be/NNBcCkPbKDY Here's a brief interview with Julian Jackson, where he states that Roy's team wouldn't let him fight him. When he says 'they' he's referring to Roy's father. In another interview similar to this one, he does specifically mention Roy's father. But I can't find it at the moment. http://www.boxinginsider.com/headlines/keeping-up-with-julian-jackson/ Just prior to the Hopkins fight, King tried to get his claws into Roy by offering the Jackson fight after Roy had split from his father. But he was wanting future options, that Roy wouldn't give him. http://www.nytimes.com/1993/02/13/s...ks-king-s-delivery-and-lands-his-punches.html After Hopkins, Malinga and Tate, he fought Toney. After Toney, he fought a few mandatories, but couldn't unify the division. In 95, The Levin brothers who handled Roy, stated after the Vinny Paz fight that they didn't want to turn Roy over to King, because he again wanted future options. Unfortunately that link is no longer available online. But in 1996, just prior to the Bryant Brannon fight, he did an in the ring interview live on HBO. Now if you've followed Roy over the years like I have, then you'll know that HBO and Ron Borges, were Roy's biggest critics. Watch this short video. http://youtu.be/4TPjvtASn0c Read this link with Frankie Liles's former trainer Jack O'Halloran. http://ringsidereport.com/?p=2112 In 97, after the rematch with Griffin, Roy was serious about fighting Evander Holyfield. But Holyfield said he had no interest in fighting 5'10, LHW's. Roy then signed to fight James Douglas, but his father pulled the plug at the last minute. Here is a recent interview with Chris Eubank. http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=502072 There's also various links on the DM saga, that's been uploaded many times on here. Unfortunately I don't have any to hand. But HBO did their best to try and make the fight for him. Here is an article from 2002, detailing problems with the Hopkins rematch. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/sports/boxing/stories/2002-07-10-jones-hopkins.htm So you can see that Roy didn't choose the path of least resistance. The reason he went up to HW to fight Ruiz, is because of the criticism he received because fights like DM and Hopkins II had failed to materialise, and the fight fans were extremely frustrated. The reason Roy didn't fight Byrd, was because he was a near 35 year old LHW, who at that point, was looking to cash out on a mega fight against the likes of Tyson. A Byrd fight wouldn't have made big money, and Roy didn't want to fight him, because he said both of them would have been waiting on each other, and it would have been a boring fight for the fans. A Holyfield fight was almost made, until King pi$$ed of Evander, which resulted in Evander fighting Toney for less money, with no title at stake. When a big mega money HW fight didn't materialise, he took on a huge challenge by burning muscle, to drop back to fight Tarver at LHW. Even after he was finished as a top level fighter, he tried his best against Joe Calzaghe and Bernard Hopkins. Today, he's trying to secure a CW title at 46. So you can see that Roy wasn't just content to fight easy mandatories. It's a common misconception that he took the easy path and dodged and ducked. He had a bit of bad luck, but there's always things happening behind the scenes, that the average fan isn't aware of. When fights don't get made, people are quick to jump to conclusions, and they shout 'duck!' But boxing is a business. A business with rival networks, rival promoters, and with demands of future options and who's getting the higher percentage of the upside of the PPV, etc. Things that aren't common knowledge. That's why I come on to these threads to fight Roy's corner. He's my favourite fighter (if you hadn't already noticed ) and he doesn't get a fair shake. I'm as disappointed as anyone else that certain fights didn't get made. And he's made a few mistakes in his career. But this was not a guy who tried to con the public. He was a truly remarkable fighter, and he deserves a lot of respect. :good
Yes, I think it's a shame things didn't work out differently. The lineal champ isn't that important to me. Because it all depends on the circumstances. Of course I'd have loved to have seen the Dariusz fight. But you'd got two huge egos who wouldn't back down. But Zolt Erdei became the lineal champ. The lineal champ isn't always the best fighter. I'd have loved Roy to have unified at SMW. But it just wasn't possible. So he moved up to LHW. Again, he fought everyone relevant, with the exception of Dariusz. As per my previous post, he'd missed the boat at MW. A rematch with Hopkins would have been great, but he wanted an equal split, even though Roy had beaten him, and he'd have had to have dropped weight. So unless Roy got the bigger split, there was nothing to gain. He didn't really want to lose weight at that point, because he'd already got one eye on the HW division. By the time he went to HW at 34, he had zero interest in the CW division. Because his goal was to make history and to make huge money. IMHO, he went to HW two years too late. Also, IMHO, he's now using the CW division just as an excuse to prolong his career.
Great post! :thumbsup I know circumstances dictate a lot of things. I will only point out that, the length of your response indicates 2 things: 1. You are very familiar with all of the criticisms, big and small, that his biggest detractors and objective fans alike have directed his way. 2. If it takes a response of this magnitude to excuse all of Jones' shortcomings, than his critics and detractors are at least onto a little something. :good