Two things: 1. As special as he looked, there will always be question marks surrounding his prime because he failed a test for a banned substance. As such, everything he did was suspect. 2. Forgetting that point entirely - as amazing as his athleticism was and as unbeatable as he looked - a lot of question marks do surround his career, which conveniently missed many of the best names during his stay at each of the 4 divisions he is best known for competing in.
Look, if you're convinced that Roy did all he could to consistently face the best available opposition, then nothing me or anyone else says is going to change your mind. Whether you want to admit it or not, Roy fueled his critics and detractors with plenty of ammunition because of the way his career unfolded. This is true now, and it was true back when he was actively fighting at the height of his popularity when his abilities peaked. Roy will always have his fair share of vocal unconditional supporters, and he will always have an equally fair share of vociferous critics looking to tear down his every accomplishment. As with most things, the truth probably lies somewhere in between - regardless of whether you're willing to acknowledge that. :smoke
The point Rold made was that Roy avoided those types of fighters for most of his career and then lost to them when he fought them. And he thinks he avoided them for so long because of how their styles matched up. In other words, he was scared. Your points about Calzaghe and Floyd don't hold much water. You're saying Calzaghe should have moved up in weight before he did. I'm saying Jones should have fought the guys who were champs in his own weight class while he was in it. That's totally different. Floyd, I agree with all of it except GGG, who isn't in his weight class. Calzaghe cleaned out a weight division. Floyd is kind of working on it now. Jones never even tried. Why was a Benn unification impossible? People did care about the WBO belt, and they DEFINITELY cared that Collins beat Eubank and Benn twice. That was a highly, HIGHLY desirable fight in 1996-1997, and Roy didn't want it because of the BELT?? Virgil Hill clearly cared about it since he fought an unknown DM in Germany for it when he was lineal unified champ... Dariusz would travel. It's a matter of record. ROY wouldn't travel OR have Dariusz come to him, because he was the real champ and had KO'd literally all of his opponents since unifying the titles. Roy was afraid of him. Explain how Byrd would bring less $$ than Ruiz, particularly in a unification after Roy beat Ruiz? Hopkins demanding a 50-50 split is not 'pricing himself out.'
Stupid post: 1. I've already said I think Froch has a better resume than Calzaghe at SMW. I've also said that Calzaghe's resume at SMW lacks depth and names, the SAME criticism I level at Roy's career. The difference I pointed out was that Calzaghe was always the B-side unkown champ that the other champs didn't have to fight, whereas Roy had all the power he needed to force unifications. There's no hidden agenda here. 2. Of course he outclassed the people he fought. They weren't even the best in the division (aside from Toney, who may have been seriously drained). 3. I like Rigo, Floyd, Pep, and Ali. Ali fought everybody and he had a seriously ridiculous chin...and everybody loved him. Pep was a genius, and people at the time loved it. Floyd has next-level skills, and he make a ton of money so I don't think he's short on supporters. I don't know any coach or boxer who doesn't respect his abilities. He's often rightly criticized for his opposition, but if he beats Pac and Brook/Khan this year to unify the division I doubt people will be hating on that (aside from waiting til Pac declined, but still). Rigo is the same as Floyd except he doesn't duck nyone, it's the other way around. Remember what I said about Calzaghe being foreign/unknown/high risk? That's the problem Rigo has. The other champs in his division are actively making excuses about why they don't need to fight him, and he's still far and away the #1 boxer in the division. Try to set up strawmen all you want, the fact is Roy is one of the only boxers I can think of besides Floyd and some of the old-time color-line fighters who could easily fight the best and decided not to. You can still appreciate his talent, but you have to acknowledge that he was a ducker.
Here is another example, a far better example of a fighter who ducked. http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=480349
You just won a trip to the ignore list for persistent stupidity. Go graduate from high school and then take a few philosophy/logic courses at your local college and you can come back and speak to me and the other intelligent folks :hi:
stupid really that is a excellent example of pure duckers the bizitchkoffs were the first duckers of this new era they were leaders. people should see the list that these pathetic klitcho bizatches ducked Here is another example, a far better example of a fighter who ducked. http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=480349
To the applause of the audience, Jones states: “In my time, do not tell me there was a guy close to my weight division that you thought could beat me. Because if you told me that, you just wrote him a scripted nightmare, because it’s a must that I find out. That’s what real boxing was about when I came along.” http://www.thefightcity.com/jones-jr-on-floyd-mayweather/
Lmao....seems someone likes to criticize one fighter but doesnt like it when a more valid criticism is leveled at another fighter! Dont break my heart by putting me on ignore, and please dont be upset with because of the whooping youve taken in this thread! :rofl
Dariuz would surely travel. No doubt about it. It's completely proven in his record. He traveled to Germany for 49 of his 50 fights. He only had a single home fight in Poland against the redoubtable Joey Degrandis. Dariuz loved to travel. Adored it.
He travelled to Seoul, Korea. Had a rather nasty time there. But then again you think Park Si Hun was a deserving gold medalist, don't you.