Criticizing Jones' resume

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KillSomething, Jan 9, 2015.


  1. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    This, for those of you who have never tried it, is one of the best feelings about trolling and meaning it. You get to read responses like that one there.

    So did anyone ever refute any of Serge's points that supported my points?
     
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    I've missed this thread.

    :lol:
     
  3. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    Of course I've never accomplished much in boxing. :huh I think nobody on this forum has, or they'd have better things to do. This isn't about me. I also suspect you didn't read the OP. It's not me hating on Jones, it's me stating the facts of his career and how he came to be 'the champ' at LHW without fighting anyone legit or defending against anyone legit. He was gifted his belts, and then he defended them against mandatories chosen by sanctioning bodies which were notably corrupt at the time.

    And the fans of boxing played right along because just like today, fans would rather see their fighters keep winning than challenge themselves and run the risk of the illusion crashing.

    Roy Jones was a good fighter. Skill/Athleticism-wise, I'd say he was an ATG (of course there's the roids issue, but who wasn't on em back then). Of course he displayed zero skills after his precipitous decline, which is something that most great fighters didn't have. Most fighters who were truly great were able to rely so heavily on their skills that their athleticism wasn't even needed by the time it faded (Hopkins, Moore, Calzaghe, etc.). Roy wasn't like that. His skills were deficient and he had a weak chin.

    This thread is about his career path, which to any objective observer is clearly a weak one. Even the most subjective fanboys like Loudon are accepting that his career sucked, they just have semi-good reasons why he took the path he did.

    Nobody has refuted the fact that Roy simply didn't fight the other top fighters and champs in his divisions. It can't be argued because it's a hard, objective fact.
     
  4. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Not hating on Jones " Let's all laugh at Roy Jones Embarrsing Career "

    If that's not hate I don't know wha is :patsch
     
  5. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    You haven't just stated facts though have you?

    Nobody who names a thread title like you have, is open to having an objective debate.

    You have been destroyed by all of my links, that show things that you clearly weren't aware of.

    But instead of taking all of the information into consideration, and debating like an adult, you have questioned them, and then left the thread for a week.

    Not one single person is arguing that Roy didn't miss guys.

    Not one single person is arguing that he couldn't have had a better resume.

    But you will refuse point blank to allow for any circumstances.

    I've told you on numerous occasions that I will gladly have an objective debate with you. Yet you're clearly not interested.

    Now be a man, and admit that you were wrong in saying that he chose the path of least resistance.


    How are you going to argue against this:

    https://books.google.co.uk/books?id...&sa=X&ei=koPBVLWlCoKAU6GsgMAH&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAQ

    ?


    Nobody can argue against that.
     
  6. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    :patsch
     
  7. KillSomething

    KillSomething Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,126
    57
    Dec 1, 2009
    I'm sure that link, if it wasn't inaccessible, would prove your point.

    I left for a week because I got banned for posting what Rigondeaux said about LSC and Quigg verbatim. Certain offensive words are banned for a reason, it seems, though nobody has been able to point out that reason. So I assume it's to direct us all to the other forum that has a Lounge and doesn't censor words and opinions. I rather enjoy it and will be spending most of my time there along with the other former members of this site who KSAB.

    You posted links from Roy himself and from his network. I don't think either of those sources would be interested in objectivity. Forgive me for going the ad hominem route, but I would expect Roy and his team to defend his career. And Roy is not known for backing up his own hyperbole.

    Roy had the power to make the fights. McClellan, Benn, Collins, Nunn, Rocchigiani, Hopkins, and DM did not. They had less to lose going in than Roy did. They called him out, not vice versa. The fights didn't happen. Public opinion will be forced to assume that Roy wanted the fights less than they did. There are always circumstances. How often in boxing does one fighter come right out and say "No, I refuse to unify with this other champion"? Rarely. There's always some sort of reason. For Roy, I'm leaning toward assuming he was afraid to risk it.

    The thread title was a way to get more viewers :p The OP is full of facts mixed with a little of my interpretation, but facts nonetheless.
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Why can't you have an objective debate?

    As much as I love debating, it's just getting tiresome.


    The link that I have posted is perfectly accessible.

    But if you seriously can't access it, then just type the following words into google: Evander Holyfield, Roy Jones Jr, Jim Thomas, Greg Fritz. The link is an excerpt from Jim Thomas's book, titled 'The Holyfield Way.' Jim Thomas was Evander's attorney for 13 years, and he made all of his fights.

    The book was published in 2005, and Evander publicly endorsed it, which you can see for yourself if you do a little research.

    This is what is written in his book:

    In late February, with issues regarding Evander's next fight still unsettled, I got a call from Greg Fritz, who was a friend and an adviser to great light heavyweight fighter, Roy Jones Jr. Fritz said he and Jones wanted to come to Atlanta and have dinner with Evander and me to pick our brains on what Jones should do next with his career. I talked to Evander, who readily agreed, and we all met in a private dining room at my favourite Atlanta restaurant, Pricci.

    After all the pleasantries, Jones expressed his frustration about not having enough viable opponents who justify big purses. Jones had thoroughly dominated his weight division, and was looking for a challenge. He asked whether Evander had any interest in fighting him. Jones was then fighting at 175 pounds, and has moved up from middleweight to super middleweight. Evander very politely and respectfully told Jones that he would not participate in a bout with anyone of Jones's size because Evander had nothing to gain. If Evander won, people would merely say that he beat a guy who too small to fight as a heavyweight. Evander did tell Jones, however, that if Jones beat another top heavyweight, Evander would fight him.


    Now nobody can argue with the above. Jim Thomas is highly respected, and Evander has read the book, and publicly endorsed it. Which means that what Thomas has detailed, is the truth.

    Roy went to Atlanta to discuss a potential fight.

    So now what have you got to say?

    I don't believe that you can't access the link, but seeing as though I've typed out the full context, it no longer matters.

    A guy who chose the path of least resistance, would not go to Atlanta to try and negotiate a deal with Evander Holyfield.

    Now be a man, and admit that you were wrong.

    Nobody can argue against that link.


    Regarding his network, HBO, you can't have it both ways. If you're happy to discuss the times when they crucified him, (Ricky Frazier fight) you also have to acknowledge the times when they supported him.

    You can't just pick out bits and pieces to suit your agenda.

    Larry Merchant and boxing writer Ron Borges, were always Roy's biggest critics.

    So when they supported him when he said he'd tried to fight lots of guys, you know that Roy was telling the truth.

    Because if they hadn't been shown actual proof, they would never have aired the live interview.

    He went to HBO and said "You find me who you think is a suitable opponent, and I'll fight them."

    Yet they couldn't find him one at the time.

    Kerry Davis who was the VP for HBO, tried to bring Dariusz to the U.S.

    Now why would you not believe that, when there's links quoting him?


    Explain to me how Roy had the power to make those fights against the guys you've listed?

    He couldn't make them fight.

    Frankie Liles's trainer - Jack O'Halloran, moved Liles into his house and got the best out of him. Again, he said Frankie had a great fight lined up with Roy, yet blew it. He then called him foolish, and then parted company with him.

    So what more do you want?


    How did those guys have more to lose than Roy?

    Roy had all three of the major LHW belts around his waist during the negotiations to fight Dariusz.


    Now come back and debate with me in and adult manner. Because all you're doing at the moment, is blatantly ignoring all of the links, and then just continuing to type the same old nonsense.

    You can keep typing it over and over again, but it's not going to make it true.
     
  9. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,382
    3,791
    Feb 20, 2008
    :lol::rofl:patsch

    Loudon you realize this meeting between Jones and Holyfield was right around the time Evander was going to fight Lennox for 20 million right? Why on earth would he fight Jones instead of Lennox? :-(

    You just post stuff and don't even consider what was going on at the time.

    This is beyond pitiful of you :lol::rofl
     
  10. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Seriously??

    Just read the link in it's entirety.

    :patsch
     
  11. DirtyDan

    DirtyDan Worst Poster of 2015 Full Member

    10,705
    3,788
    Oct 30, 2011
    Roy Jones is the greatest fighter of his generation, a legend and an ATG.

    Why would I or anyone else laugh at his career?
     
  12. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,382
    3,791
    Feb 20, 2008
    I don't have to read the link I went to High School with Holyfields nephews who were in his camp and I know what happened. Holyfield was not going to fight Jones anytime before he fought Lennox. The Lennox fight had been brewing for years and was a huge fight a much bigger fight than Jones ever dreamed of being in. Your 'Link' is meaningless.
     
  13. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Please stop embarrassing yourself.

    It's cringeworthy reading your responses.


    Roy met with Thomas and Evander late February, 1998.

    At the time, Evander's next fight was still unsettled.

    After they'd had dinner with Roy, Evander fought Vaughn Bean in September, 1998.

    He didn't fight Lennox until March, 1999, which was over a YEAR AFTER he'd met with Roy.


    Also, a potential fight with Lennox was not the reason why he turned Roy down. Again, read the link. Or get someone to read it for you. He turned Roy down, because he thought he was in a no win situation.


    So once again, you've failed miserably.

    :patsch
     
  14. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,382
    3,791
    Feb 20, 2008
    One. Last. Time. Holyfield wasn't going to fight Roy until he got to Lennox. It would be idiotic to do such. They were trying to make the Lennox fight for 18 months. And unlike Jones and his failed 'negotiations' for big fights Holyfield made it happen. I was at the Bean fight btw. He fought Bean in Sept of 1998 the Lennox in March of 1999. That is a difference of only 6 months which was the typical length between fights. You seriously have no clue what you are talking about and it is sad.

    I want you to explain to me how/why Holyfield was supposed to fight Jones before a Lennox fight with that many millions of dollars on the table. The Lennox-Holyfield talks started in March of 1998 :lol::lol::lol:

    It takes time for big fights to happen. Roy wouldn't know that though because he hadn't had one since 1994. :rofl
     
  15. anton

    anton Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,132
    0
    Sep 22, 2012
    Id bet my money on the mw jones beating every other mw in history