:| Adamek need not be questioned on his level of competition. Steve sure did go after a tough challenger in his first defense....are you telling me he didnt fight the Boxing caveman for money? BTW according to your logic take away Wlod taking a knee in the rematch and it's a draw....marinate on that for a while. Not once have i seen a Pole say they dont want Adamek to rematch Steve.What we are saying is STOP being a cry baby hypocrite! This content is protected
So why did Steve sit on his belt for a year only to go on and fight a caveman if he is so willing to fight the best? Roy Jones-Frazier-Telesco Chad Dawson-Ruiz,Mendoza Larry Holmes-Mike Weaver.... What makes Adamek any worse than those guys?
And you are here bitching about money>>>???WTF. So he could have fought but wanted more money...hmm and you are getting on someone else's case about the same thing???The only difference being Adamek didnt sit on the title because he was too good to fight for peanuts.If you kept up with what has been going on these past few months you would no that he was set to fight on July 11 against whoever it may be.He got jerked around by BHOP couldnt make the Johnson fight happen,Flores is terrified of everyone(that's another discusssion BTW)and Godfrey was scheduled but backed out. But Steve only fights the best available guy with the least amount of skill.Only been boxing for 3 years at that point it shows.Marco!
nah i wanted to hear some opinions before i made my move. the conclusion..Steve is untouchable when he decides to be he only fights the best Adamek is ducking him Adamek got 3 yes 3 lucky K/D's The fight WILL HAPPEN stop crying and stop being a hypocrite.
:| What do you call a 90-10 split in favor of Hopkins?How many times must i call you out on your hypocracy. Adamek will KO Pizza Boy and he will calim he slipped and hit his chin on the canvas. Steve is a GRADE A Boxing cry baby.
they didnt feed him didnt give him ice didnt check Wlod's gloves 17 times. replaced the judges at the last minute(IBF has that power not Wlod) didnt pee test..blah blah blah:|
So basically there is exactly the same situation right now. IBF ordered mandatory fight for Cunningham and Braithwite similarly like they did force the second fight between Wlodarczyck and Cunningham. In the MEANTIME according to your own word Adamek have the full RIGHT to "test the water" and fight whoever he wants ... right? Banks was legitimate top 10 contender and Gunns is the only option at this time. I believe Steve was not available before he won his mandatory spot ordered by IBF so there is no such thing like Adamek DUCKING Cunningham. Now Adamek have legitimate 5 months (up to December 2009) for fight Cunningham again ...
why the fuk re u spreading these lies? when u dont know **** ,dude dont u know that u have to be coming from a win to get an IBf title shot? Dont u know that ur boy USS was on the adamek-banks fight talking about his upcoming title eliminator with braithwaite?? so under thos circumstances how the fuk could adamek duck him if the braithwaite fight happened a few days ago?atsch
Straight up hyprocrite...it's OK for Steve to never give a rematch and it's OK for Steve to test the waters and it's OK for Steve to NOT fight the best(HUCK)but it's a problem when someone else does it.
IT was already ordered by the IBF as the Title eliminator , and cunninghum himself was saying(at the adamek-banks fight) that he has only a bout with braithwaithe on his mind atm , so you fail man if u have any honor left then its your time to admit that adamek is not and never was ducking Steve uss cunninghum whot i personally doubt u re able to do