Current David Haye vs Ali at the rumble in the jungle instead of Foreman

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Duffy, May 9, 2012.


Page 2 of 2
  1. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    28
    Jan 29, 2008
    Ali would have won this fight by KO. Haye would be competitive for a while, and earn Ali's respect. Over the long haul, though, Ali's lightning quick combinations and dazzling right hand would have caught Haye's chin.
     
    kenmore, May 9, 2012
    kenmore, May 9, 2012
    #16
  2. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    :D

    It's not even about physical attributes...Haye doesn't have giant balls like Ali or Foreman.
    At the elite level, fights are won more on intangibles than tangibles, imo.
     
    fists of fury, May 10, 2012
    fists of fury, May 10, 2012
    #17
  3. steve w

    steve w Active Member Full Member

    815
    12
    Jun 5, 2011
    Forgetting the massive gulf in skills, fighting in the swetering African heat required something else, courage and mental endurance, two elements obviously lacking in Haye but abudantly obvious in Ali, silly post!
     
    steve w, May 10, 2012
    steve w, May 10, 2012
    #18
  4. Duffy

    Duffy Guest


    Duffy never said that.
     
    Duffy, May 11, 2012
    Duffy, May 11, 2012
    #19
  5. FrochFan

    FrochFan Active Member Full Member

    712
    0
    Mar 3, 2011
    Foreman was way bigger. Foreman has a longer reach than the Klitschkos while Haye has a disadvantage against the Klits.

    And Haye is 6'2 in working boots.
     
    FrochFan, May 15, 2012
    FrochFan, May 15, 2012
    #20
  6. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    This content is protected
    :thumbsup


    Foreman Hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooook!:rasta
     
    Foreman Hook, May 16, 2012
    Foreman Hook, May 16, 2012
    #21
Page 2 of 2