Current fighters whose Development has hit a Ceiling.

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by SkillspayBills, Jul 11, 2012.


  1. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Alright Lads. Hope your all doing well.

    Looking forward to finishing work this Saturday and watching the boxing :yep.

    Anyways lots of thread's this week and this has lead me to making this thread.

    Fighters progress at different rates and in different ways. What fighters do you feel have hit a ceiling in there development and may not be able to get any better.

    Khan has been a major point of interest this week, lots of threads and points made after what seems a now infamous sparring clip on Behind the Ropes. Has he hit a block in his development and can he get back on road? or do you feel his mentality is to far the wrong way.

    I don't want this to just be about Khan, I'm looking at fighters domestically and world wide.

    State why you think this and what could change to help them beat the block so to speak..
     
  2. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    Domestically the main culprit is Nathan Cleverly

    When you suddenly go stale and stop getting better , thats usually followed by a slight dip in form , which isn't good in the fight game as it usually can end up in a fighter losing a fight decisively he was actually supposed to win , or a real bad scare

    This sparring clip nonsense is just that !! , Khan was sparring for God's sake , I've been bashing him on other threads :D , but people actually saying he's gone backwards because of a sparring clip is utter drivel , if Khan has gone backwards Danny Garcia will beat him , because there aint much between them , if Khan is at his absolute best i would expect him to stop Garcia bearing in mind styles

    If that makes sense

    Anyway back to my point , solution = change stable , its the only feasible solution to going stale with a trainer
     
  3. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Good post Win :good.

    I look at someone like Pavlik, Does a change of trainer necessarily mean there will be continued development though?. I've watched 2 of his 3 comeback fights and in the first fight he looked to have a bounce in step. Watching the Rosinsky fight i saw a fighter who fought mainly off the left hook to body. Didn't operate his famed jab and looked to be back to the fighter under Loew.

    I agree with Cleverly as well, I've said it once or twice in past but Cleverly once fought on a U.S undercard to a Calzaghe fight and i be honest i said that night 'he's **** poor, he'll never amount to much'. He went on the win British,Commonwealth and European titles before gaining his world title he proved that i know sweet f.a :lol:. The development from that night to winning the European title was staggering IMO. Since i've seen a fighter who has totally lost his way in the ring. If anything he's gone back to the mentality of that undercard fight. Scrapping!.
     
  4. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    Wow i was expecting more input on a very good thread , a topic well worth talking about IMO , that said you did post this up late and it is still early

    Pavilk is a strange one isn't he ?? , alcoholism is something that surely must be holding him back , well his history in alcoholism i mean , you never get them years back as an ageing fighter !!

    Cleverly , i couldn't agree more mate , seems to have come up against a brick wall the poor lad

    Edit : i think timing is also key , if your looking to change stables and improve and get better but physically you are on the downward side of your career (Pavlik) , then realistically in your heart of hearts what can you be looking for , if like you say a fighter is still fresh but its clear the change is needed due to " hitting a ceiling " then its improvements and knowledge your seeking , and the important factor there is , your still young enough and fresh enough to work hard and fast at making them changes
     
  5. steelcity

    steelcity Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,661
    1
    Oct 8, 2011
    one of the problems with clev and especially khan is they believe there own hype. khan got taught a boxing lesson against peterson, made so many mistakes in the build up to the fight and thats why he lost, But because of the PEDs and the hatman he has not learnt from his lesson and he will go into this fight in the exact same mindset, im starting to think a very poor garcia could still do khan.
     
  6. ems_kto

    ems_kto Active Member Full Member

    550
    0
    May 2, 2010
    Frankie Gavin.

    Fight more regularly, fight better opposition, become more dedicated.

    He's a talented kid, but isn't showing it at the min.
     
  7. SkillspayBills

    SkillspayBills Mandanda Running E-Pen Full Member

    21,647
    4
    Oct 3, 2011
    Thanks Win :good, Great post as well. I must say i've spoken my mind about Garcia elsewhere i'm not on this hype train of his. I don't think he's the next great trainer some like to think. He's obviously boosted Kelly's belief and change of scenery but i can't see Pavlik beating any of top names at SMW. He looked distinctly average the other night IMO. Power doesn't seem to be there either which will be a major problem.

    Yeah the PEDgate has papered over the cracks a fair bit, I'm really looking forward to saturday. If Garcia adapts to speed and stays in fight past early rounds we could be in for another Khan classic.
    Yeah he's not living up to potential i agree, It will be interesting to see his development once he steps up to title level domestically. When he has real tests will he then start to develop?.
     
  8. mishima

    mishima Guest

    I think i will wait to see Khan's fight performance rather than a single sparring clip to make a judgement on Khan's development
     
  9. Go Getta

    Go Getta Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,444
    0
    Sep 9, 2011
    :good

    Both Fury and Price have come on alot in the last year.
     
  10. Klitman

    Klitman Active Member Full Member

    906
    0
    May 29, 2011
    Inactivity is a huge barrier in terms of fighters developing..

    I was expecting to learn more about groves, degale, Gavin etc this year. But due to inactivity I would say i am none the wiser on how these fighters will develop than i was this time last year.

    Then you have poor matchmaking (sorry Clev) which again stops the fans from knowing how far a certain fighter can go.

    All we can do is speculate and rumour as to how we think fighters will develop when they are A - inactive B - matched against poor opposition.

    This all comes down to the promotors and matchmakers who have to take responsibility for this.

    What can you do ??? Change promotor.

    In terms of active fighters who have hit a block, I would say someone like McCloskey is a prime example. Who has basically lost his last 3 fights (i am including prescott) when stepping up in class.

    Not to sure what he can do to change / improve as I dont belive he has the tools to mix at world level, assuming he accepts this I would continue fighting on the European scene with a view to trying to get another crack at a wold belt
     
  11. Gero

    Gero Active Member Full Member

    1,259
    1
    Feb 28, 2010
    I read the title and knew Khan would be mentioned in the OP. I have to agree, going by the sparring (yeah, yeah i know its only sparring) he seems to have learned nothing from the Peterson fight. No doubt Roach is a fantastic trainer but it seems over past 3 years Khan has made little to no adjustments to his game since his initial beginnings at Wildcard.
     
  12. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior I'm vital ! Full Member

    34,379
    11,867
    Apr 19, 2010
    could not agree more:yep, hope it all comes good for him but time waits for no man :bart
     
  13. rooq

    rooq Rooq's Boxing Promoter Full Member

    12,353
    0
    Jan 16, 2007
    Scott Quigg. Looked like he'd be one of our best prospects at one point, but hasnt really developed over the last year or so...unfortunately the Munroe fight didnt last long enough to tell us much. I'm not sure if he's hit a ceiling or gone backwards tbh
     
  14. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    Whist were on the subject , I'm going to include Stephen Smith to this debate , once considered a boy wonder of British boxing , a Featherweight who was extremely successful as an ama , and was looking not to shabby as a young pro either !! ??

    Well what the ****s gone on !! , because he isn't the same kid he was 2 years ago , the Selby KO , or Joe Gallagher ???
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Khan - for the reasons said already

    Clev - complete failure to use his attributes to the best of his ability

    Quigg - good shout Rooq.... from a mini-Hatton to mini-Murray :-(

    On Roach, I think as a trainer he's living off his reputation. As a strategist he's still there, but I'm certain that his health issues are affecting his ability to work with his fighters as he needs to do, and also from getting his point across in the corner.

    He's probably suffering because of the fact that a lot of fighters go to him because they've been knocked out by an opponent who they ought to have beaten, rather than because they want to improve.

    It's probably a great gym for young lads to go and spar in, crack a few heads and come home a smarter, harder fighter, but not somewhere I'd advise a lad base himself.

    Clev just needs to leave Vince and work with a proper trainer. The maths degree won't be of much use when he's punch drunk by the age of 30. It's either easy fights from hereon or repeated KO losses

    Quigg's decline is particularly alarming..... his feet now look like they're stuck in chewing gum when he tries to move, and his punches are more predictable, he's easier to hit as a result.

    Smith.... I've long had my reservations because he's the worst inside fighter I've ever seen. He makes Khan seem like James Toney in the close exchanges.... so why he tries to fight in the Gallagher style I've no idea.

    It's his career, so if he doesn't want to do anything about it, **** him. He's throwing his career away.