Currently, Kovalev is already in or around the top 50 Light-Heavyweights all time

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Mar 14, 2015.


Page 1 of 3
  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,959
    48,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    He's already almost inarguably ahead of Michael Moorer. Moorer barely touched the top five in his twenty odd fights at light-heavyweight. In his twenty-six, Kovalev is already into the top five, beating #5 (Nathan Cleverly) and #1 (Bernard Hopkins). Possibly the champion isn't going to let him anywhere near him, but if he beats Pascal tonight (#3) and is convincing doing it, I think i'd put him nearer 41 than 51.

    That would put him ahead of a lot of very good fighters. Light-heavyweight is weird historically. Not to put too fine a point on it, once you're outside of the top forty it's a bit **** for an old-eight division. Not deeper than heavy. But that Kovalev belongs already is scary.

    Rankings are TBRB.

    Funny for active fighters. He wins tonight, he's already stalking greatness...if he loses, he's nobody, historically speaking.
     
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    #1
  2. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    244,871
    240,077
    Nov 23, 2013
    I agree with you on this one.
     
    CST80, Mar 14, 2015
    CST80, Mar 14, 2015
    #2
  3. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,043
    Oct 13, 2010
    He's a monster. Don't see him losing for a long time, maybe that Beterbiev tank will be a threat down the line though
     
    Beouche, Mar 14, 2015
    Beouche, Mar 14, 2015
    #3
  4. Vysotskyy

    Vysotskyy Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,457
    385
    Oct 1, 2013
    I have never actually compared them but have you ever broken down the top 100 P4P by divisions? Lightheavy seems like it would be quite top heavy all-time quality wise. Beastly lineup...

    Greb, Langford, Charles, Moore, Conn, Tunney, Spinks, Gibbons, Loughran, Dillon, Johnson, Marshall, Walcott
     
    Vysotskyy, Mar 14, 2015
    Vysotskyy, Mar 14, 2015
    #4
  5. Vysotskyy

    Vysotskyy Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,457
    385
    Oct 1, 2013
    Signed with Haymon so doubt we'll see that PBC will ruin super fights left and right. If you think there was a lack of consensus for divisional #1's because of sanctioning bodies just wait, Haymon will show you otherwise.
     
    Vysotskyy, Mar 14, 2015
    Vysotskyy, Mar 14, 2015
    #5
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,959
    48,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    Top heavy is absolutely the correct way to put it. Once your out of the top 35 it gets really, really soft. Heavyweight is far stronger 40-70 for all that this is partly because HW used to get the best HW's best years until the 90s.
     
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    #6
  7. larryx2012

    larryx2012 I AM BETTER THEN YOU Full Member

    12,523
    33
    May 24, 2012
    ok
     
    larryx2012, Mar 14, 2015
    larryx2012, Mar 14, 2015
    #7
  8. GGGunbeatable

    GGGunbeatable Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,085
    8,550
    Feb 14, 2014
    Yes
     
    GGGunbeatable, Mar 14, 2015
    GGGunbeatable, Mar 14, 2015
    #8
  9. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,290
    7,869
    Sep 2, 2011
    He could have potentially a great career considering the possible opponents in and around his weight division; Ward, Stevenson, Betrebiev, Golovkin maybe down the line?
     
    Cafe, Mar 14, 2015
    Cafe, Mar 14, 2015
    #9
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,171
    83,069
    Nov 30, 2006
    Kovalev is champ, not Stevenson.
     
    IntentionalButt, Mar 14, 2015
    IntentionalButt, Mar 14, 2015
    #10
  11. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,513
    15,926
    Jul 19, 2004
    Based on this, where do you rate Hopkins at 175 historically, McGrain?
     
    Rumsfeld, Mar 14, 2015
    Rumsfeld, Mar 14, 2015
    #11
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,959
    48,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    Same bracket, just behind, based upon their h2h result. Presuming he doesn't loose in 2 hrs!
     
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    #12
  13. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,513
    15,926
    Jul 19, 2004
    So Hopkins at 50 is penalized that much because of their head-to-head? Just saying, if you look at their complete body of work, Hopkins was arguably a 2x linear champion, and had arguably beaten better competition than Kovalev has.

    What about Calzaghe?

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Mar 14, 2015
    Rumsfeld, Mar 14, 2015
    #13
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,959
    48,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah but he got destroyed by Kovalev.

    And actually, after tonight, if Kovalev wins, they'll have the same number of top five guys. And Hopkins lineal claims are in dispute (not that i care THAT much).

    Calzaghe's nowhere. 1-0 gets you nowhere.
     
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    McGrain, Mar 14, 2015
    #14
  15. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,513
    15,926
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol::good

    If Pascal somehow pulls this off some way or another (and I don't think he will), Bernard could become relevant again.

    So on that note...

    WAR PASCAL!

    :smoke
     
    Rumsfeld, Mar 14, 2015
    Rumsfeld, Mar 14, 2015
    #15
Page 1 of 3