What we can say it that sometimes we take their views (journos et al) for fights like pacman-jmm/Bradley and sometimes we don't like rigo-nonito It's subjective at times depends what we see innit
Look at his twitter and the account of the fight on his website. Must be trolling. Called it a 'stinkbomb' and that he 'despises watching guys who run.' In this instance at least, he DKSAB
I was genuinely worried when Lampley started saying that some people were seeing a different fight to what HBO were seeing. Maybe it looked different from certain angles ringside but the fight looked so easy to score to me. 118-109 Rigondeaux, the only rounds I was tempted to make even were rounds 5 and one of the later ones I think but I will have to watch it again, other than that they were CLEAR Rigo rounds.
Rafael, Mannix, and Iole all outed themselves as ****ing idiots after the fight. For what it's worth, The Ring and fighthype had it pretty much spot on.
I actually looked at his twitter like 5 minutes ago, I knew he was dumb but wow, bet his ***** ass didn't tell Rigo that **** in the elevator after the fight, if Rigo didn't win the 12th Rafael would have had it a draw, guess who had the exact same score? Arum, I bet you Arum paid for the hotel that Rigo and Rafael both stayed at, I tell people this **** is dirty.
Dan Rafael is one of the young guys who is on twitter who competes for attention and respect, so he has to say provocative things to get people to think and talk about him.
A lot of people had the fight scored a bit differently. Maybe they had trouble seeing the punches that were actually landed.
I don't understand why anyone still takes Rafael's opinions seriously. He's good for breaking news & that's about it
Or the money blinds him, if Donaire won one more round he had it a draw, no excuse for that but corruption.
Dan Rafael needs to go straight to LensCrafters , they have a promotion this weekend on lenses and frames. And then get his ass in the gym.