Dan Rafael!??!?! thats it,iam done!

i found that the more scorecards you read, the larger the variety .. so whatever. ya's simply found another reason to ***** about rafael

 

he probably never been in the ring or know the sport

 

Any writer who was ringside had a first class flight, luxury hotel, nice seats and a nice meal paid for by Top Rank and HBO, there is no such thing as an unbiased writer.

 

:rofl

 

That is a great article.

 

The fact that they praise Steve Kim in contrast to Rafael knocks it down a few pegs though.

 

Probably never? It's not even in question of course he hasn't, that fat **** should not even be reporting on our sport.

 

Kim is a better writer. Fat Dan is truly mediocre at his craft.

 

Kim is superior to Fat Dan.

Fat Dan is a disgrace.

 

I gave Donaire 2 -3 of the earlier rounds. Some of u guys dont know how to score fights. You score on landed punches. How many punches was Rigo landing? They were both barely letting their hands go, and when you got about 2-3 landed punches per round to measure, that's no landslide either way. People are scoring on looks , and how Rigo made Donaire look tentative and follow him around the ring -- not actual, landed punches which there were very few in the fight, and a good number of them landed by NONITO.

 

That was something hope more folks read it.:good

 

well young compared to guys like Marley or Bernstein. He is a guy who came around during the internet era, but he is near 40. I mean young in a good way.

 

+1

 

Well then there is no need for us to discuss this. You have your mind made up, and anyone who disagrees is simply biased. Oh, and many of these writers get to these fights courtesy of their employer, not the promoter.