Got to see the second fight of the trilogy yesterday, without having seen the first or third fights. I was hoping i would be able to find the fight on the net so i could post it in the general forum, as it was an absolute gem, but no luck in that department. Could not find much on the other fights in the trilogy either unfortunately. The second fight was an absolute war, FOTY type material if it wasn't for a certain Chavez - Taylor matchup. The amount of time spent going toe to toe was unbelievable. To be honest it was difficult imagining Zaragoza winning the other two fights in the trilogy, going by the second fight, as it seemed when Banke turned the heat on he simply hit too hard for Zaragoza, and took Zaragoza's flush shots (and there were a lot of them) quite well. Though it seemed Banke got lazy and careless at times, possibly lacking focus, which i imagine is probably how he lost the other two by decision. Got a few questions for anyone who has seen all of the fights: Was the scoring in the first fight dubious, or was it a fair decision? Were both men considered "prime" for all three fights of the trilogy? Were the first and third fights anywhere near as exciting as the second in terms of toe to toe action and punishment dished out? Cheers.
