and one of the worst hairlines names arn't the be all end all of resume's. The time at which you fight someone and the public verdict of the outcome of the fights you "win" on paper matter. What do you think looks better on paper: Floyd beating Pac in 2009 or Floyd beating Pac in 2015. It's black and white...almost no comparison. Khan - win that allowed him to step up to champion level Guerrero - Pointless....Alexander/Algieri tier is where he should be fighting now. Mattyhsee - win that secured his champion status This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Holt - required win to step up a level This content is protected Campbell - required win to step up a level "wins" highlighted in This content is protected bring big question marks over his respectability.
Gotta agree as a Matthysse fan I wasn't sold on Danny til this win, while he took a slight step back with the Salka fight his level of comp is top notch. Every fighter will have or has had a controversial fight if you fight enough quality comp, overall his body of work is one of the best in this current generation.
Good resume. Too bad he didn't actually beat Herrera or Peterson, and he blatantly ducked Postol, but he still has a good resume even with those caveats.
Postol would've done a number on him, as well. They were smart to keep paying the man to stay away before leaving the division.
