Very far from it. Definitely beatable and if it weren't for the controversy he would be top 5 P4P. Very good fighter but like everyone has his flaws
Garcia was missing alot too.but if you've got two fighters who are missing alot, id give the rohnds fo the guy whose doing the work. Garcia was making a fight of it and all Peterson was doing was running around, posing, pot shotting and missing. That's why u gave the first 6-7 rounds to Garcia.
Garcia is terrible. Poor footwork, poor selection of punches, has a tool of a father and needs to move up to 147.
#1 fighter in a division is terrible? I cant stand the guy but anyone who knows anything about boxing an see he is far from terrible.
Absolutely ridiculous. The man is 30-0 WBC WBA title holder. He's beaten everyone put in front of him.
Got away with murder against Matthyse, lost to herrera, lost to Peterson. One thing that seriously concerns me about Garcia, is how much fouling he is allowed to get away with in fights, but the questionable officiating would explain the favourable decisions he got against Herrera and Peterson.
Garcia is a special type of fighter. He might look beatable at times but he clearly does not know how to lose.
What does he do well apart from throw a great left hook? Funny how his nickname is 'Swift' yet it's as he's wearing concrete boots when he's in the ring.