Danny Green EXPOSED? - Nice Video!

Who knows how the police have become aware of your conduct? You've pissed off enough people with your infantile games, so your behaviour may have come to the attention of the police by various means. Once the police are made aware of criminal behaviour they are bound to investigate it, hence why they would have telephoned Zelky. Maybe the coppers were having a slow week that week.

***

Here you go, dopey:

Crimes Act 1958 - SECT 21A

Stalking

21A. Stalking


(1) A person must not stalk another person.

Penalty: Level 5 imprisonment (10 years maximum).

(2) A person (the offender) stalks another person (the victim) if the offender
engages in a course of conduct which includes any of the following-

(a) following the victim or any other person;

(b) contacting the victim or any other person by post, telephone, fax,
text message, e-mail or other electronic communication or by any other
means whatsoever;

(ba) publishing on the Internet or by an e-mail or other electronic
communication to any person a statement or other material-

(i) relating to the victim or any other person; or

(ii) purporting to relate to, or to originate from, the victim or any other
person;

(bb) causing an unauthorised computer function (within the meaning of
Subdivision (6) of Division 3) in a computer owned or used by the
victim or any other person;

(bc) tracing the victim's or any other person's use of the Internet or of
e-mail or other electronic communications;

(c) entering or loitering outside or near the victim's or any other
person's place of residence or of business or any other place
frequented by the victim or the other person;

(d) interfering with property in the victim's or any other person's
possession (whether or not the offender has an interest in the
property);

(e) giving offensive material to the victim or any other person or leaving
it where it will be found by, given to or brought to the attention of,
the victim or the other person;

(f) keeping the victim or any other person under surveillance;

(g) acting in any other way that could reasonably be expected to arouse
apprehension or fear in the victim for his or her own safety or that
of any other person-

with the intention of causing physical or mental harm to the victim or of
arousing apprehension or fear in the victim for his or her own safety or that
of any other person.

(3) For the purposes of this section an offender also has the intention to
cause physical or mental harm to the victim or to arouse apprehension or fear
in the victim for his or her own safety or that of any other person if-

(a) the offender knows that engaging in a course of conduct of that kind
would be likely to cause such harm or arouse such apprehension or
fear; or



(b) the offender in all the particular circumstances ought to have
understood that engaging in a course of conduct of that kind would be
likely to cause such harm or arouse such apprehension or fear and it
actually did have that result.

(4) This section does not apply to conduct engaged in by a person performing
official duties for the purpose of-

(a) the enforcement of the criminal law; or

(b) the administration of any Act; or

(c) the enforcement of a law imposing a pecuniary penalty; or

(d) the execution of a warrant; or

(e) the protection of the public revenue-

that, but for this subsection, would constitute an offence against subsection
(1).

(4A) In a proceeding for an offence against subsection (1) it is a defence to
the charge for the accused to prove that the course of conduct was engaged in
without malice-

(a) in the normal course of a lawful business, trade, profession or
enterprise (including that of any body or person whose business, or
whose principal business, is the publication, or arranging for the
publication, of news or current affairs material); or

(b) for the purpose of an industrial dispute; or

(c) for the purpose of engaging in political activities or discussion or
communicating with respect to public affairs.



* * * * *



* * * * *





(6) It is immaterial that some or all of the course of conduct constituting an
offence against subsection (1) occurred outside Victoria, so long as the
victim was in Victoria at the time at which that conduct occurred.

(7) It is immaterial that the victim was outside Victoria at the time at which
some or all of the course of conduct constituting an offence against
subsection (1) occurred, so long as that conduct occurred in Victoria.

Note Section 7 of the Stalking Intervention Orders Act 2008 provides that the
Court within the meaning of that Act may make an intervention order in respect
of stalking.

 

Dickhead, I'm not really interested in what you and Zelky have said to one another.

You claimed that only the AFP deals with internet offenses and asked for an example of state jurisdiction.

I provided that without much effort at all.

 

Mate you need to undertand he would NEVER turn up anywhere I am going to be in the future. All his bluster on the internet is just that.

He's banned from Sydney anyway. And he's a ****en idiot if he advertises the fact he's coming to Sydney. Id' hazard a guess that there will be a welcming party comprising of all the peolple he has put **** on in boxing forums.


No way he'd turn up mate. Back top reality now.

Aspiring pros/fighters don't do this **** mate. Ty needs to seek mental help.