Nice of you to stand in for Franus. You didn't answer the question. Since you claim to call a spade a spade, why don't you address the shortcomings of the other orgs? Or do you & Franus limit yourselves to cyber-policing the IBO only?
You do understand Ty what a positive record means????? If a fighter has won 4 out his last 6 fights that is a positive record!!! Dip****..hahahahahaha
Is this the "THEY DID IT ASWELL" defence :yep This content is protected two wrongs dont make a right. no point in bching about other orgnisations when you cant even get the ones in your own backyard right. If the IBO wants to be creditable they should lead by example and not be looking for excuses to the nature of their corrupt ways. When you put up a system and rourt it then its not a fair and open system anymore it has become corrupt and must be rooted out and exposed! No other orgnisations are as bad as the IBO, and they have their right hand man here in Australia. Should i start with the most squeeky clean one based in USA or some other country? or hows about some title ive never heard of before, would that make you happy ? facts are facts and the IBO can not hide from them, they dig their own grave on a regular basis with these fraudlent matchups.
Dont look to positive to me! but hey im not an Austin Groupie bch so what would i know hey! :yep Come on Ben Austin, explain this one for us since you got so much wisdom in that head of yours..
No need to waffle. All you had to say is that you are obsessed with the IBO. That is all. Why isn't it a concern to you and other boxing purists like Franus that the "legit" orgs are doing far worse than the IBO?
and why the hell should he answer it. Its just a question a hater would ask. Like Green said its the fighters that make the belt. He brought big names here. Do you guys actualy like boxing, or just ***** about it all day.
Briggs rated #50 or w/e after 3 yrs of not fighting? are there only 50 CWs in the entire world or something guys?
Good evening Johnny "GAY" Boy. You seem to be posting about boxing for once which is good although you are defending the indefensible in the IBO.atsch All boxing orgs are pretty bad but the IBO is the worst imo with their joke fights. No mandatories means guys like Greeny who have bought the belt can defend against bums for years on end. The only boxing belt with merit is the Ring Magazine belt imo. It's very sad when boxing fans as a whole only really pay attention to who a magazine rates as the champion of the world. I talk about the IBO a lot on these boards because their Australian official Phil Austin has talked on these boards and is more than happy to explain away their ludicrous decisions. I would discuss the WBC a lot as well if Jose Sulaimen or one of their officials posted here. You seem to be happy with the IBO's decision's.
Franus75, you must be pretty proud of the "GAY" boy tag you just came up with.atsch The "no mandatories" issue is the only thing that upsets you about the IBO? They can't be that bad if that's all you're worrying about. Phil Austin no longer posts here and hasn't done so for a long time. If he's the reason you expend so much energy you should find something else to do with your troll time. And The Ring had been respected for a lot longer than any of the current alphabets have been around, so it's not sad at all. Any boxing fan would know that. Stick to topics you actually know about like felching. Now **** off.
He answered your first question by admitting he got flogged, what more do you want? And I would suggest, after the flogging he got, that it would be silly for him to concentrate on anything other than Tarver and the rematch, wouldn't you agree?