Danny Green v Danny Santiago

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by leaduppercut, Jul 16, 2012.


  1. exodus

    exodus Active Member Full Member

    1,028
    0
    Jun 25, 2012
    It was fixed.

    Australian boxing, in Perth nonetheless, is beyond corrupt.
     
  2. Chappy112

    Chappy112 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,347
    10
    Nov 14, 2009
    Of course we deserved to lose, he lost hahah idiots. I love it when people pipe up after the event.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,419
    Nov 30, 2006
    Santiago is a bigger bum.

    I read the same reports (couldn't watch it) and several independent reports on Twitter from individuals at ringside painted more or less the same picture.

    Dull fight, Santiago coming forward and trying but failing to be effective. Green fairly easily jabbing him and then breaking him down by the mid-rounds, stunning him with increasing frequency before dropping him a couple of times and ultimately bringing on the stoppage.

    Santiago sounds like he was completely useless, but I'd ascribe that to the fact that he's been useless for years and is essentially a ball of rusted tin plucked from the scrap heap to give Green a bow-out W rather than him "staging" a non-effort as part of an orchestrated fix. (although Green does have fishy history with Briggs..)
     
  4. leaduppercut

    leaduppercut Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,878
    0
    May 23, 2012
    Apologies to anyone who lost out on this based on me making this thread... I didn't suggest anyone to go for it, it was just an idea I was throwing out there and looking for opinions.... I didn't go for it in the end and I think I said I wasn't going to earlier in the thread... here's to the next idea being more successfull, let's keep our eyes out :good
     
  5. Natural1

    Natural1 Guest

    Hey, like Dwyer says "this is an opinion of a complete stranger online"
     
  6. leaduppercut

    leaduppercut Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,878
    0
    May 23, 2012
    :good

    To be honest I don't rate Dwyer very highly at all.. same guy that said there was no way Haye klitschko would go to the cards and adamantly thinks Hopkins and 48 year old Holyfield would have a good chance to beat Wladimir! :patsch
     
  7. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    Green destroyed him. :lol:
     
  8. leaduppercut

    leaduppercut Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,878
    0
    May 23, 2012
    That quote was before I had watched his last few fights, heard other's opinions and seen the horrible shape Santiago showed up to the weigh in..
    I was just throwing an idea out there and asking for opinions.. I actually predicted Green would win after thinking about it further..read the whole thread
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,564
    83,419
    Nov 30, 2006
    Be that as it may, Danny Santiago in 2012 is not someone who would likely get licensed anywhere in his home country but for the dodgiest state athletic commission. (like maybe the one that allowed that doubleheader of Mesi post-brain-bleeding and Morrison post-HIV-positive-testing :-()

    Green - even the current version - thrashing the current Santiago is not only perfectly believable without there needing to have been corruption, it's the only outcome in this match-up that wouldn't come as an utter shock.
     
  10. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    santiago was crap when the fight was signed and proved to be **** after the fight was over
     
  11. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    Danny wins this fight.