LOL you two cannot be serious. I thought you were being sarcastic.. but you're actually serious.. 2004 is Mike Tyson's prime? Seriously? He first won the title in the 80's. It doesn't matter if I'm American. Anyone who is not ******ed knows Mike Tyson was a walking corpse by then. I guess McBride is a legend too huh? Did he beat Mike in his prime as well? It's a shame then.. Mike Tyson retired while he was still prime!
Reading or sensing sarcasm through text? Sarcasm is easily detected through tone of voice. Through text, not as obvious. You might be sarcastic.. but I think that other guy is serious.. you never know with these biased Brits on this forum
Unfortunatly I am remained on this bandwagon for a bit too long, I'll stay on for a bit longer hopefully depending on big Dans performance. Hopefully he'll produce again, big KO...Klitschko brothers here he comes!!!!
I agree that sometime it can be easy to get the wrong end of the stick on the internet, but lets be honest it was blatant sarcasm.
From highs like demolishing Mike Tyson and the very capable Kali Meehan.. To the lows of losing on points to Mike Sprott and a stoppage by Audley , and struggling against clowns like Harold Senior for the commonwealth.. Danny confuses me.... He can be an absolute world beater , then lose to an absolute novice........ Enigma..........