Darchinyan VS Donaire, I smell an Upset...

Now?? I'm a LIAR?? **** YOU MUTHER****ER!!
I can be rude, crude, and confrontational, BUT I DONT LIE LIKE YOU you little ****:good

No, I didnt get my ass kicked, only in you're land of delusions, twat. At best you got a draw on a technicality. Ultimately my position, proves out and when confronted with the scenario's? All you did was ignore and kept clinging to a false position.

You can keep huffing and puffing but you'll never blow my house down There's a difference between real and imagined, and you character SUCKS:good Stalking?? I'm more likely to be ASSAULTING More made up insinuations, which only display the fantasy world you exist in.

In the end, the guy who didnt pick ****(lack of knowledge) attacks the guy who made a rather bold prediction, and then talks lots of **** Truly impressive PG, keep showing you're ***** to all

 

:|:|:|:|

To all? Though "all" didn't matter to you? If it does, then you should acknowledge the posters who told you that you got your ass handed to you in that debate. Not a single one sided with you. On top of this, you refused to acknowledge that the site you used as proof worked against you later on. :deal

Bottom line...there is no technicality No Money. My position is 100% everytime. Your position is predicated on MY position being present. That makes you wrong. End of story.

Confronted with SCENARIO'S? You tried to make the WBC International Title part of the lineal equation AFTER constantly saying it was the Big 3 belts that mattered. You then added the WBO. Backtracking and manipulating at it's best. My position is the right one. Always has been always will be. You're so confident, start a poll. But you won't....you'll say you don't care what others think....unless they agree with you, then you acknowledge them.

 

Shut up C Money! Most everything I have read from KG on here has been very ubias and to the point.... I guess some people cant deal with that. Before you go insulting someone's character take a look in the mirror buddy because your a real *******!

 

Ahhh. PG, you wouldnt know reality, IF it smacked you in the face!!Though I' admit, I'd be willing to give it a shot
Those couple posters?? Well, did they see the whole argument??
The first thread gets deleted, then you CHANGE positions and say I said things THAT I DIDNT BECAUSE YOU ARE A LYING *****:good You're position a 100%??? You said PBF was lineal at 35, and I used the site as PROOF of you being wrong. So much for 100% I said PBF wasnt lineal or unified at 35, but was respected by Ring as champ, that started the whole thing. After you were clearly wrong, you started a new thread, lied, and twisted.

I did acknowledge that that site contradicted my view that unification WAS REQUIRED to fill a lineal vacancy, even though we have NO IDEA of who's determination of the #1 and #2 ranked fighters they are using are The bottomline?? Unification enures that WHOEVER's 1,2 actually FIGHT EACH OTHER!!! Thus producing a new lineal champion. PROVIDE THE 1,2 guidelines to be used and source, and then compare it with unification:good I'll be damned, if it doesnt work most of the time, even if not technically required by that site. They have more vacancies than champs and if we had more unification? That wouldnt be the case. Keep on running from that REALITY!!!

As for the scenario's I gave you the Champ's and showed that even with the Big 3(International, not included) that unification still works in the majority of cases. The BO?? Another twist of you're imagination!! I said all a long and long before that thread, that if you include the BO, UNIFICATION WORKS 95% of the time. That wasnt "added" it was there ALL A LONG, *****.

As for the BC International title?? It's another way for Org's to play their bull**** games. You discredit the fighter by the belT?? Funny the BC international title was on the Line with Pac at feather. Also Hatton is the BC international title holder and STILL lineal champ at 40.:good So while you dismiss it, it has REAL CHAMPIONS which you're willing to take out of the equation. You're perspective STILL DOESNT HOLD WATER or have a definitive position.

So PG??:finger you are a **** and it continues to show over time

 

Mindreader Thanks for you're contribution, but I'll defend myself at all times. Unless you've read all that is referenced between he and I? **** you:good from one ******* to another

 

LMAO....You can't do math can you? 95% of the time is not ALL the time. 100% trumps 95%.

Your position: Unification is required to create a new champion. Unification is the Big 3.

My position: #1 vs #2 are required to create a new lineal champion, regardless of who holds what belts.

You admit that yours works MOST of the time. Mine works ALL of the time. Yours ONLY works with my position being part of the equation. If one of the top 2 doesn't hold an ABC belt, then unification doesn't create a lineal champion. Your position is predicated on mine. In my equation, the unification is unnecessary and is only present because the top 2 fighters often, but not always, hold belts.

You even went as far as to try and add the WBC International title in the case of the 130lb division as part of your unification strategy when you realized that Pacman (#1 fighter in the division) wouldn't be part of a unifcation tourney and therefore wouldn't create a lineal title. We all had a good laugh at that one. Then after your NUMEROUS (and I quoted them) posts of the BIG 3 being necessary, you tried to add the WBO at the end.

The other posters in the thread throughout said you weren't making any sense. So yah, they read it. And you looked exactly as you do now. A sore loser grasping at straws.

 

Proof of a hypocrite. You jumped all over me in this thread without even knowing what PacDbest and I were talking about. Then you say that to another poster? :deal

Priceless.

 

So your position is that you will continue to pick Filipino fighters because they are simply better fighters than their counterparts. Fair enough. But if they lose, be prepared to deal with that situation.

But don't be dishonest. PacDbest believes his countrymen are better fighters because he is their countrymen. That is not unusual. But he shouldn't act like he handicapped the fight. He didn't, he just went with his countrymen. I wonder what his prediction of Bobby Pacquiao vs Soto was?

 

KG,

Give the guy a little credit, yes he did ultimately go with the guy because he is a fellow pinoy but the reasons he mentioned were right on the money.

Unlike many huggers he did bother to offer rational explantions to support his dogma. He said movement, size, reflexes and ultimately the left hook would win the day and they did.

Let the dude have his moment in the sun. He may miss in the future but he went against conventional wisdom and did win the day.

goldn

 

I did let him have his moment. Wouldn't have said a word to him if he hadn't come into a thread entirely unrelated to this and said something about me that was unnecessary. The only reason he did so is because I said something other than Pacman is the best ever.

Either way, he only supported his dogma this time. If he wants credit then he shouldn't dog other fighters who are not Filipino and admit when he is wrong. He once called Mosley an overrated fighter who had accomplished nothing. He said Willie Pep wasn't any good because he didn't have the power of Pac.

 

This content is protected

POW!

 

Oh god

 

Remember this?

Don't try and take some kind of high road. You hold the grudge. You even mentioned that I don't join in your discussions. You're the one who felt the need to act like a child here and so now I am addressing your relentless stupidity again.

The post you were responding to have nothing to do with defending PBF. It was about someone saying Pacman is the most underrated fighter on ESB, which he's not.