Darchinyan VS Donaire, I smell an Upset...

He is talking about analyzing styles for fights that haven't happened yetatsch
Not scoring fights that are there. Go ahead...post what else Amsterdam said about me.

Let me ask you...I was nominated 3-4 times in that thread. How many nominated you or PacD? You shouldn't have used that thread to make a point.

My advice, realize the fight was close and could have gone either way. THAT'S why every time it's discussed here, arguing ensues on BOTH sides.

 

I believe it was you crying about not getting a lopsided bet that you wanted. Don't worry, you'll feel better after your vacation.

Remember, I offered the bet. You just tried to gain an advantage.

 

I know its rubbish. Just complete rubbish. From now on the only Pinoy poster I will bother replying to is: The Underdog. Unlike the rest you can actually have a decent discussion reagrding boxing with him. The rest are just so ridiculously biased its unreal.

 

yey for kg!!!!arty

you like that don't you?
ok egocentric give me the exact number of rounds dd landed his shots harder..
cos to tell you the truth that shots may be harder but it still did not stop em to outbox him through out....
and on a ratio on how many dd labded his shots to em even harder?? it might only be 2-5

 

Guess that didn't work out for you huh? Another hypocrite here? It's ok for PacD to brag about himself cuz he is Pinoy right?

You brought it up right? Or was it only good to talk about as long as it helped you by denegrating me? Predictable.

So cheerleader, (that is what you were doing for PacD right?) 6 rounds he landed harder shots. Just accept the the fight was close and move on.

 

:|:|:|:|:|:|

About not getting an unfair advantage.

 

nope i was doing it for you coz you said you were nominated 3-4 times.. i was not cheering for pacd i'm just focused on you..helped me degenerating you? c'mon it's common sense that em won and dd lost so don't hide the fact on scorecards and "harder shots".
i give dd only 4 rounds.
now let me ask you again: are harder shots justified if it did not hit clean?

 

We aren't using Vegas odds, especially since they make their odds based on the general public, not what the boxing community thinks. It's not a fair representation of what may actually happen since many just bet on what they are told.

Thats why HERE at ESB, most bet straight up. Ask around. If you can find a majority who agrees with you, I will take your bet. 16 weeks to 1 week.

 

Fact: you brought up the thread, not me

Fact: This is cheerleading and not just focused on me.

Fact: It's not common sense that EM won. If it was common sense, everyone would agree for the most part. They don't.

He landed harder shots and plenty were clean. EM landed cleaner shots but they were not hard. Isn't this the SAME exact scenario in which many of you Pacman fans claim that Pacman really won the first fight with Morales? Landed less but harder shots? :deal

 

so to truly "validate' your point kg i have this:

dd: a mexican raised in chicago

where was it held?: in chicago

did dd won convincingly?: hell no

so along with the ref and the bias judges in chicago what to do now?
let's make dd won

most analyze it as: cheated. go to the youtube comments and see if any chicagoans defended dd

em said dd was resorting to dirty tactics?: justified. he was eating elbows for tacos. when he was clinching the ref was only looking.

kg analyze it as; dd won coz it was scored that way get on with it!

like they said:"if there is smoke there's fire", if there are doubts there are questions. there are clear doubts!

so kg likes dd i'm beginning to doubt why?:gayfight

 

Whatever floats your boat there.

I gave you my scoring. Has nothing to do with how the judges scored it.

You need a conspiracy cuz if Morales won, it would make Pacman's win look better and his loss look better.

Hmmm....another pinoy making gay jokes.