Darren Sutherland

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by mcintyre1981, Dec 12, 2010.


  1. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    That is a ridiculous thing to say, like Groves will just rollover. People get too excited about the last thing they remember. Beating Smith has nothing to with beating Groves.
     
  2. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010
    It's still a big difference - a 20 year old vs a 24 year old. at their respective peaks, it wasn't a contest.
     
  3. lirva

    lirva Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,335
    97
    Jul 7, 2010
    Groves isn't on Degales level mate. Are you going to be the next avidlemon?
     
  4. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    4
    Jan 31, 2010
    What's ridiculous about it? I said he has done nothing to suggest he would beat De Gale, I didn't say he'd definitely lose to him.

    De Gale has beaten better opposition with ease. Groves was damn close to getting stopped last time out against someone Smigga would have beaten imo.

    I stand by my point, there is nothing to suggest Groves has De Gales number. There is plenty of evidence to the contrary.
     
  5. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    No, the point I'm making is that there is no real basis to assess levels yet. DeGale beat Smith, as expected and in the manner expected. Seems a bit daft to be ejaculating over it, really.

    And Elvis, there's no evidence for either side. DeGale beat a man he was meant to beat. All there is to it. Groves had a harder time than expected against Anderson, but came through it. DeGale's a little older, a little more mature, but Smith was made to order for a fast-handed, mobile fighter like Chunky.

    Groves, alternately, was facing a biggest stylistic problem in Anderson.

    It's not just about levels here, it's about styles. I see no evidence to pick one over the other yet.
     
  6. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    4
    Jan 31, 2010
    So why did you say Groves will beat him.
     
  7. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    Cause I think he will, but it's not based on anything more than my instincts. But I'm not one of the people talking about levels when there's no true indication of their levels just yet.
     
  8. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    4
    Jan 31, 2010
    I guess I'll just have to disagree. I think there is enough to show us De Gale is a better fighter, just my opinion.

    I also think Cleverly has shown himself to be better than Bellew also.
     
  9. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    i totally agree with the second point!
     
  10. artful

    artful *practice makes perfect* Full Member

    4,163
    0
    May 8, 2010
    What happened with your vcash?
     
  11. TFFP

    TFFP The Eskimo

    45,002
    4
    Nov 28, 2007
    DeGale would have beaten the crap out of Sutherland in the pros. You only have to see Sutherland hit by jabs off journeymen to know that. DeGale would have messed him up bad with the speed and variety he has offensively.

    Sutherland would have been a fine pro himself mind, would have got to the world stage and challenged for a title at least.