Wlad easily won round 1 to 3 You could give Davarryl a 10-8 for round 4, but he was in trouble in the last minute of that round. Round 5 was virtually a nothing round, depends on who you give it to. So we if give Davarryl the benefit of the doubt in both round 4 and 5 we get this... R1 10- 9 R2 10- 9 R3 10- 9 R4 8-10 R5 9-10 47-47 Draw. If you have R4 a 9-10 (like 2 of the judges), it's a win for Wlad. If you have R5 even, it's a win for Wlad. If you have R5 for Wlad, it's a win for Wlad. Only if you have 1 even, 4 a 10-8 and 5 for Williamson you could give the fight to Davarryl with a 1 point difference. I can't see a robbery in here with a magnifying glass... You could have Williamson winning only if you really, really score in his favour. Normal scoring is certainly for Wlad in this case.
One thing's for certain with those two - shards of someone's jaw would've ended up all over the canvas, over the ringside judges, in the referee's hair etc.
Round 4 is a 10-8 round. Those judges must have been watching a different fight or something, either that, or they don't know how to score a fight. Wlad may have had Williamson wobbled for a few seconds late in the round, but that is nowhere near enough to overturn a knockdown. Well, Williamson definetely has one 10-8 round, regardless of whether Wlad was odd balance, a KD is a KD. You could also make an argument for him winning one of the cagier early rounds, in which neither landed much (I wouldn't personally). So in that respect, it's not that much of a stretch to have a draw or Williamson win by a point. You'd be being generous, but realistic all the same. Not a robbery by any means, but certainly worthy of a rematch.