dave parris needs to be sacked

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by gattiwarrior, Oct 15, 2011.


  1. gattiwarrior

    gattiwarrior Guest

    117-112

    never 5 rounds in that fight
     
  2. supremo

    supremo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,765
    14
    Oct 15, 2009
    Every ****ing week we need to put up with corrupt ****ers of judges! absolutely shocking.
     
  3. happydrinks

    happydrinks directfraction.storenvy.com Full Member

    5,167
    0
    Sep 14, 2009
    Nothing happens when it happens on Sky it's going to be brushed under the rug and the rug nailed down on ****ing Boxnation.
     
  4. victorhugo4222

    victorhugo4222 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    0
    May 29, 2007
  5. Llanlad

    Llanlad Active Member Full Member

    642
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    Im sure hes done this many times ...

    Someone needs to dig up some scorecards that hes given in big fights over the last few years that where totally different to the other 2 judges.
     
  6. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    If there is a lot of close rounds a judge can legitimatley score them all to one fighter, -this is boxing and this is why there is multiple judges- stop whining
     
  7. supremo

    supremo Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,765
    14
    Oct 15, 2009
    Its the facyt that all these decsions that are wildly out of kilter with common sense are all in favour of the promoter's favourite fighter.
     
  8. Rocky

    Rocky Active Member Full Member

    511
    0
    May 14, 2008
    Im surprised he hasnt been done in yet, its time and time again with this ****.
     
  9. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    2
    Oct 21, 2008
    Fed up with saying it about the guy tbh...
     
  10. roe

    roe Guest

    DeGale "winning" earlier was worse but yeah 117-112 is definitely a little too wide.

    Means he only gave Bellew 3 rounds outright :patsch
     
  11. gasman

    gasman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,159
    3
    May 16, 2009
    How many times has it been said, the board turn a blind eye to this bull****. The same cliche of officials are on every show. Total bull****.
     
  12. simona

    simona New Member Full Member

    66
    0
    Sep 14, 2011
    You obviously haven't got a clue about boxing if you think degale didn't 'win' that fight :patsch
     
  13. roe

    roe Guest

    Well most seem to disagree with me and I've no problem admitting if I got it wrong so I'll rewatch some time tomorrow and see but this is how I scored it:

    1 - Wilczeswki
    2 - DeGale
    3 - Wilczeswki
    4 - Wilczeswki
    5 - Wilczeswki
    6 - DeGale
    7 - Wilczeswki
    8 - Wilczewski
    9 - DeGale
    10- Wilczewski
    11- Wilczewski
    12- DeGale

    116-112 Wilczewski

    Most people seemed to give it to James DeGale just because he's James DeGale from what I can see.

    The commentary was perhaps the most biased I have ever heard. One of the rounds DeGale spent at least 2 minutes against the ropes and yet John Rawling said during the round "DeGale is leaving nothing in the tank"

    There were several other times DeGale got caught with 2 or 3 good, solid punches that had no mention from the commentary. Wilczewski then naturally held on a little and DeGale slapped back only for John Rawling to go into full ball licking mode claiming Wilczewski was "in trouble"

    I'll rewatch and make a thread about it tomorrow :good
     
  14. deebest

    deebest Active Member Full Member

    826
    0
    Apr 24, 2009
    Paris is a Joke as soon as they said his name I was waiting for a stupid score and sure enough he didnt disapoint. Cleverly won by 2-3 Rounds 5 Never.
     
  15. steelcity

    steelcity Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,661
    1
    Oct 8, 2011

    did degale bully you at school or something?