David Haye: "About the same size as George Foreman"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Earl-hickey, Oct 12, 2011.


  1. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    I heard this comment recently, that David Haye is only half an inch shorter than Foreman and Foreman was only 220lb in the Ali fight

    Do you think Haye is about the same size as prime Foreman?
     
  2. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    Yes, he's almost the same size, maybe even longer. He's not as tough or as powerful or a big when compared to his contemporaries (which is the big thing).

    Did you read that comment on hubpages? lol
     
  3. cesare-borgia

    cesare-borgia Übermensch in fieri Full Member

    28,924
    20
    Jul 4, 2009
    This is strange, I think of foreman as this huge guy where haye is a small heavy, yet they are basically the same size.
     
  4. Big Red

    Big Red Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,281
    579
    Apr 29, 2011
    David Haye is not that big of heavyweight these days but put him back in the 70s he would have been a big heavyweight.
     
  5. Boom1989

    Boom1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,102
    0
    Mar 26, 2011
    Foreman is an inch taller.

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  6. pirao666

    pirao666 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,327
    2
    Jun 18, 2011
    Why would a HW cut weight before a fight? Do you realize how dumb that sounds?
     
  7. Earl-hickey

    Earl-hickey Boxing Junkie banned

    14,011
    3
    Oct 31, 2010
    Heavyweights in the old days used to do it belive it or not, not sure if Foreman was one of them but they did used to do it
     
  8. MrMagic

    MrMagic Loyal Member Full Member

    39,534
    71
    Oct 28, 2004
    Foreman has more bone density than Haye, and is naturally much stronger.
     
  9. pirao666

    pirao666 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,327
    2
    Jun 18, 2011
    No they didn't. Do you think those guys were stupid? Cutting weight offers no benefit whatsoever in a weight class that has no weight limit, and can actually be detrimental to your performance, why would they cut weight?
     
  10. Blake Rayne

    Blake Rayne Fat Cuban Aficianado Full Member

    5,373
    11
    Mar 26, 2011
    These answers are hilarious
     
  11. sadlittleboy

    sadlittleboy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,792
    0
    Mar 12, 2009
    7 votes for cutting weight?...jesus we really do have some tards on here.
     
  12. pirao666

    pirao666 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,327
    2
    Jun 18, 2011
    I think many people don't know what cutting weight is. At least I hope so...
     
  13. Bill1234

    Bill1234 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,314
    499
    Jan 28, 2007
    Despite the weight being relatively close, Foreman was bulkier and more broad.
     
  14. COLD-HARD-TRUTH

    COLD-HARD-TRUTH Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,566
    8
    Sep 21, 2008
    Foreman was a natural 220 when he was in shape... the difference is, Haye has to bulk up to get to 220. Close thread
     
  15. Threetime no1

    Threetime no1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,890
    94
    Oct 29, 2010
    Foreman is simply a bigger man than Haye. In size and strength. /thread