David Haye pulls out of July fight, says Klitschko fight is dead

Waldimir set on his ass most of 2009 waiting on Haye, and he said he would never do that again....

 

:nut

**** for brains

 

First it was Haye bished out and is a coward, and now that Haye wanted to make the fight, Wlad chose the almighty Chisora instead. atsch

This perf3ctly illustrates the sorry state of the HW division, and why the Klits are disliked anywhere other than Germany. O well, I don't care about their boring fights anyway.

 

Thats exactly what Wlad wants and the whole Klit camp.

They want Vitali Haye and Wlad nowhere near Haye, they know the outcome.

Notice he is now fighting Adamek in September knowing Haye retires in October, so even if Haye did fight the brother with a bit of bottle, Wlad has covered himself now.

 

So presumably WALDO is only warming up VITLAYS WBO belt then, considering Sanders KO'd WALDO for it then dropped it to fight VITLAY for the WBC crown?

WTF is WALDO doing claiming he's the WBO champ?

Try answering that one and defending your previous post at the same time. Good luck with that.

 

Someone else who sees all the bull**** for what it is....thank you for that sir :good

Haye is being pushed towards VITLAY, no doubt about it. After all WALDOS posturing about Haye being a coward too. He's been caught out on a lie and now the excuses are coming thick and fast (but mostly thick) from team Klitschko. Bitches, the pair of them.

 

I knew right away watching Boente on Ringside they wanted Vitali/Haye and not Wlad, that was clear.

The best outcome we can hope for now is Haye does indeed fight Vitali, a tougher fight no doubt, and beats him.

That would really make Wlad look stupid and Haye can give him and his fans a big FU goodbye as he retires.

It would confirm the outcome of the Wlad fight in the process lets be honest.

 

found this pic of Wlad and Boente leaving the negotiations...

This content is protected

 

That's what Booth said and who can really doubt that? When you look at quotes from Boente, he has a clear attitude problem. I don't think it would have been a sticking point, no, but I think it would have seemed like one, which is what I said.

That is a completely bull**** post.

For one, you talk about what titles Wlad has. Only one of those titles is legitimate and recognized, the WBO, so he holds as many official titles as Haye does. The IBF and IBO are both garbage, irrelevant belts. The Ring title is prestigious, sure.

And yes, Wlad has brought big money but he insisted on 50/50 which indicates he is an equal draw to Haye. That's just not true. If you compare their recent fights, the money Haye brings in, even against awful opponents like Harrison, is far, far more than what Wlad has ever made. That's just the facts.

Again, you make a nonsense point at the end. You go off on tangents just to make it seem like you have a valid point for no reason. Strange.

So what is boxing to you? A sport where everything is distributed equally and fairly?

If you need to know, boxing is a business and titles don't mean a ****ing thing. Mayweather could fight Martinez and even though Martinez holds every title, he wouldn't get anything close to 50/50 and, honestly, he wouldn't deserve it. If Mayweather brings in 80% of the money, he'd deserve 80% of the cut and it's the exact same thing with Haye and Wlad. You can talk all you want about what titles Wlad has but the absolutely bottom line is, Haye brings in more money.

Again, so you understand. Haye. Brings. In. More. Money.

Therefore, he deserves more money! Simple. It's the way boxing has worked for centuries, so you need to start understanding that. Nobody gives a **** who the "true champ" is in 2011. It's irrelevant. Boxing is a business and it should be treated as such. As Haye brings in more than 50% of the money, he was extremely generous to accept 50/50.

I'd say it should be 50/50 just to get the fight on. However, you should accept that it was a clear sign that Haye wanted the fight, when he accepted less than he rightfully deserves.

You thought Haye lost against Valuev? You need to learn how to score a fight, seriously. Valuev didn't land 5 clean punches, including jabs, the entire night.

Pathetic scoring.

In another thread, you mentioned you've been a fan fo boxing for a long time but I don't know if you're serious or not. If you scored the fight to Valuev, you have some serious issues with scoring.

Did you ignore the part where Haye accepted everything Wlad wanted and was ready to sign before Wlad mentioned Chisora? Had he not brought Chisora into the equation, the fight would be signed today and that's not debatable.

 

It was. K2 have said that Haye doesn't want to fight Vitali but that's never been clear. What was abundantly clear was on Ringside when Booth was talking about Wlad and Boente kept mentioning Vitali.

I personally think it should be Haye/Wlad. It's the fight everyone wants to see and makes more money. However, it's clear that K2 would prefer Vitali to fight Haye.

Will people call Vitali out, if he doesn't ask the WBC if he can unify in a fight against Haye? The ball is in his court. Right now, Haye can't do anything relating to Vitali because he's tied up with Solis but if he wants to fight Haye, all he has to do is ask the WBC. If he doesn't, is it a duck?

 

:rofl:rofl

 

Boy, this one brings back memories. Of the way we were.

This content is protected

 

The way we were?

Wlad Ko's Haye with the first jab he throws...............if he ever signs for the fight.

 

LOL hes doing the same shite again