a 46 year old evander holyfield did the same thing haye did...but didnt get the nod...and by doing the same thing i mean barley anything but more than valeuv....holyfield would have ripped his head off at 28 years old.... i gave haye credit BEFORE the fight...because i picked him....
I'm not talking about Holyfield, I'm talking about David Haye. I'm not surprised, I knew when I first engaged in conversation with you that you wouldn't sway your opinion. Why should you? This is the Internet after all.
same goes to you....youre giving haye credit for beating the worst heavyweight champ ever, the slowest, the biggest head, ...so i guess we will agree to disagree...haye beat someone he should have....but he lost alot of stock because of how he fought....:hi:
Haye was an overwhelming favorite against someone who outweighed him by almost 100lbs? I disagree. Many people thought Haye would win, but many felt Valuev won win also. It was his second fight at the weight and he was undersized to a stupid degree. He did brilliantly to go the whole fight without taking more than 2-3 worthwhile shots. I give fighters credit when they win at this level..mainly because I'm a Boxing fan, whereas your clearly a bitter hater.
I imagine it would look a lot like the Fragomeni fight. Chambers doesn't have the power to make Haye fight tentative like he did tonight. His performance today convinces he, however, that he'd get beaten by guys like Solis and possibly even Arreola, and he'd absolutely get killed by either Klitschko.
the guys fights leaonard like for one fight..WITH a borken right hand after the 2nd round and everyone bases that on future performances. Some people on here are a joke!
Chambers would UD Haye easily, given the skill disparity and aforementioned removal of one of Haye's primary strengths