David haye vs eddie chambers

Chambers would step inside of Hayes big off balance wide shots and land straight combinations. Haye ain't getting in with Eddie.

 

Haye TKO6.

 

Eddie is recovering from a scary knockout loss and a long lay off, if he can get back to where he was at pre-Wlad, this would be a very interesting fight. Chambers may not have the tools to overcome Klistchko, but if he can keep his weight down like he has been...look out anyone else, including Vitali.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU2m-ji7T1c[/ame]


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPmeZDBSxhU[/ame]

 

i guess none of you saw chambers' last fight where he looked like a huge piece of dung plodding around hitting like a ***** against a bum.

 

lets see who your boy ends up in the ring with for his retirement bout.

 

Haye hasn't KO'd a single HW since and including the Barrett fight. Not one! How on earth he will score an easy early KO win vs. Chambers who took tons of punishment from Wlad is interesting to say the least.

 

go watch chambers' last fight and then come back and speak to me.

 

I would have to favor Haye considerably. Haye against a smaller non-puncher who has a tendency not to let his hands go enough. Eddie's a good boxer but what he brings to the table is a really good stylistic match-up for David or Wlad. He's not going to expose either man's less than elite chin and he's not likely to outpoint them either, with his ordinarily low punch output. He may or may not have it in him to run close with Haye on the cards if he can return to the improved Dimitrenko form, but I just don't see him being his poison. That and he's still not too far removed from a vicious concussion knockout loss and he'd be going right back in with a big banger.

 

I've watched all of Chambers fights, again let's see who your boy signs to fight. You are insinuating Chambers is a bum? Is that what you are saying? Does Haye have someone on his resume better than Chambers? Who would that be?

 

Oh yeah and Chambers actually has a LEGIT heavyweight resume unlike the Hypemaker.

 

Can you explain to me how he's technically better?

What was "technical" about him when he stood right in front of Povetkin, and absorbed punch after punch.

What about when he had the same gameplan against Klitschko, again, standing right in front of Klitschko, squared up, straight up, with no lateral movement, only occasionaly lunging with right hand punches, against the hardest punching heavyweight who also had a considerable reach advantage.

Both gameplans were idiotic. Did you think you were watching Jersey Joe Walcott?

What the **** is wrong with you.

I'm tired of people calling Chambers a technical fighter when he's clearly not. The way he kept his hands out in front and leaned back made it clear he was going to eat a big hook. The fact that it took Wlad 12 rounds to do it, speaks volumes about his heart and courage, but that's not what we're talking about.

Haye who is FASTER, and hits MUCH HARDER, and is SLICK, will punch with both hands around Chambers predictable guard and punish him.

Chambers Euro style does not work against a guy like Haye.

 

I don't quite understand how Haye is so strong when he was a former CW and last fought at 211 lbs. Also, Eddie has fast hands but slow feet. Overall, Chambers has faced better opposition. I'd have to put my money on Chambers but it wouldn't surprise me if Haye won.

 

:rofl Hendo just denounced Chambers' technical ability in the same post as he called Haye "SLICK". Don't ever change, Henny. Don't. Ever. Change.

 

So I guess breaking Ruiz's eye socket, and getting rid of Audley in three rounds doesn't count as stopping his opponent in your bizzaro world.

 

Haye is slick.

He was hit how many times against Valuev? 5 times?

Valuev hit Chagaev every time he threw, consistantly knocking his head back. If Valuev had real power, like Wlad for instance, he would have knocked Chagaev out.

Haye is not a stationary Euro Guard fighter. That is the opposite of slick. Getting hit consistantly on your guard does not equate to slickness.

Haye has great upperbody movement and headmovement.

While he's no Mayweather certainly, he's easily the slickest heavyweight especially given the tools he has.

How beat up was he against Audley? Oh, Audley didn't land a single punch.

He didn't look beat up against Ruiz, and Ruiz fought one hell of a close fight with overly hyped Chageav, had no trouble landing on him, nor did he on Holyfield.

Who in your opinion at heavyweight is slicker than Haye?

I mean, Haye is not perfect and still does get hit flush occasionaly, but more often than not, he avoids his opponents shots.