David Haye warns Charr about Klits "Slave contract."

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JeanPaulValley, Aug 25, 2012.


  1. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    Haye comments on Charr

    "I love the guys enthusiasm, but he needs to read his K2 slave contract. As even if he wins, K2 own his ass for a few years!”

    It's pretty much true. The Klitschko brothers have all these weird rematch clauses in their contracts which just proves their tag team status.
    If you beat Vitali,you have to fight Wlad and then also rematch Vitali if you beat Wlad also or something like that.

    Never before has a heavyweight champion done this. Foreman,Ali,Holmes,Dempsey didnt have their brother helping them along.
    It's crazy that they can get away with this.
    Also,it's funny how each brother fights the guy who would beat the other.
    Eddie Chambers would have clowned Vitali and made him look foolish. That is why Wlad fought him.

    Anyway,the Klitschko brothers are still the spoiled rich kids of boxing and hopefully they will be brutalized very soon and sent into retirement.
     
  2. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Haye signed a slave contract with King in exchange for a gift decision against Valuev.
     
  3. tezel8764

    tezel8764 Boxing Junkie banned

    7,875
    12
    Mar 28, 2012
    I actually don't mind the Klits, but yeah I agree this is totally **** for opponents. No wonder why Chisora acted the way he did. I heard they never reimbursed him for Training Camps for the cancelled Wlad fight and the Vitali one. Literally payed by himself.
     
  4. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    :good:good
     
  5. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    And Briggs was never payed his full money.
     
  6. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    Haye fought Wlad with no options and after he loss he cried "i have no rematch clause".
     
  7. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    Haye won that fight because he was more marketable. He was exciting with his trash talk anyway. He was fast,good looking and charismatic.
    Valuev was slow,fat,boring and ugly as Susan Boyle's twat.
    Haye was the better face for the WBA's hw champion.
     
  8. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    That's an interesting point.
     
  9. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Several fighters should have had that title off of Valuev but none were as marketable as the Giant.

    Haye actually didnt win but King wanted a chunk of that Klit payday!
     
  10. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    :good

    Thank you.

    Without this clause Lewis would never get the chance to fight Rahman again. Lewis had to go to court to force Rahman to fight him. He could do this because of the rematch clause.

    In the history of boxing every promoter had this clause in the contract. Sometimes this was bad for the Champ himself because after he loss his own promoter had a new Champion and the old one never get the chance to fight again for the title. K2 learned from the mistake of the Champions from the past.

    Don King always says "I come with the Champ and go with the Champ."
    The Klitschkos fought 8 years for a german promoter and with options to Don King.

    What is wrong if boxers make there own deals?

    Lennox Lewis was a Champion with brain and today he has the money to live good. Other great Champions have nothing after the boxing career which is very sad.

    Wladimir fought the way back to the top and this was very hard for him. Now he is The Man in the divison. Wach for example is a voluntary defence.

    If you do not want to give options you can fight to becaome the mandatory. Have you ever heard a word from Chambers or Thompson? They are great fighters and fight the way for the chance. If you do not want to go this way who have to give options to the Champion. Just simple.

    Wlad fought an Eliminator to get another chance.

    After he was the mandatory he paid Byrd 4,5 Million Dollars for the fight to take place in germany and 2 options to Byrd for the next fight. Did you ever hear a word from Wlad that this was unfair?

    Byrd was the Champion and his own promoter (leaved Don King before this fight) and Wlad showed respect for Chris Byrd as the Champion.
     
  11. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    :|
    does haye ever stop crying?

    well one brother is 40 years old...the other has over 50 fights....if someone is gonna brutalize them, they havent done much of a good job the last decade.....
     
  12. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    almost every fighter that fights them complains about it LOL
     
  13. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    Yeah we all know Holyfield beat Valuev first.
     
  14. JeanPaulValley

    JeanPaulValley Boxing Addict banned

    4,738
    4
    May 31, 2012
    Well that's mostly true I suppose. I'll give you that. The thing I dont like is the tag team aspect. In the past if their were 2 or more champions,they weren't related. Now if you want to fight for a HW world title you have to deal with both Klitschko brothers and they really have a big advantage over these guys in and out of the ring. I guess it's good for them.
     
  15. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    The ONLY clause the K bros should enact is a rematch clause. Having the stipulation that if XX wins the rematch as well, then he must face the other k bro is just stupid.