David Haye warns Charr about Klits "Slave contract."

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JeanPaulValley, Aug 25, 2012.


  1. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    Yet they all sign the contract..get beat and, then ***** afterwards!
     
  2. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,383
    3,795
    Feb 20, 2008

    only person that said that was Haye and we know how reliable he is :lol::rofl:patsch

    The point is for a unified champion and if you are a non mandatory challenger there is going to be a rematch clause that is just the way it is. Like I said Don Kinig has been doing this for decades and people praise him as a smart business man etc. but the Klitschko's do it and it is horrible :lol:

    There is so much false stuff being reported about this it isn't even worth discussing anymore to be honest. :-(
     
  3. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    Yet not a single one of Klitshcko's common opponents fought the other one because of this "alleged" fight my brother clause.

    O well, I guess someone will have to actually beat one or the other if we're ever going to find out if this allegation is true or not.:lol:
     
  4. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    LOL of course a 10 fight contract would be acceptable if they find someone willing to sign it that is acceptable to the boxing organizations. That's all there is to it. Noone is forced to sign it!

    McDonald's pays people $5 an hour. That's a slave contract. It's awful, it's terrible. Is it acceptable? Sure if, no one is forced to sign the contract and those who sign it are happy with the terms.

    Same for Charr. He is happy with the terms because he knows the chances to fight for a belt now are better than praying he will ever get a mandatory shot, knowing he has no promoter behind him who can help him grease the alphabet soup organizations.

    Get over it, Jack. Whenever two parties agree to something within the boundaries of law then of course it's acceptable.
     
  5. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    No that is not correct. If you do not want to deal with both of them but just one all you have to do is become his mandatory challenger. No rematch contracts then.

    Then you "only" have to beat one brother and you'll never have to worry about fighting the other one if you don't want to.
     
  6. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,024
    Mar 6, 2011
    David Haye, isn't he the chap that just lost every round to Wlad Klitschko yet now actually goes around literally begging Vitali Klitschko face to face for a contract to fight him? Hmmmmmmmm, very strange.
     
  7. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    Not ridiculous at all. The holder of the fight options will make those fights that make the most money on the options. And that means fighting the K brothers, there are no bigger names. Biggest names = most money.

    Totally logical in fact.
     
  8. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,443
    1,024
    Mar 6, 2011

    That would depend totally on the individual that signed and agreed to the contract. If said individual did agree to that contract well obviously he would of found this case totally acceptable, that's genuinely how contract agreements work. Silly argument.
     
  9. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    this has been confirmed as well as pre set purse figures

    so even if a guy hits the lottery they dont let him get paid

    sickening behaviour
     
  10. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    doesnt matter anyway, none of the opponents barley win a round. they are lucky the contracts dont pay the challengers on how they perform in the ring, or all of them would end up with about 10 grand after the fight
     
  11. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,963
    514
    Oct 15, 2007
    don't see nothing bad with this! So if somebody is better then klits he has chance to make full unifiaction and beat the first brother so there is no doubt left and make huge money.

    problem is that there is nobody that could do it!
     
  12. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009

    NO. Many fighters have said this inclusing Byrd who actually had to do it.

    Stop saying its just Haye , this is a fallacy.
     
  13. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    Frank Warr*n went so far as to say that if Chisora wins, he’ll be a national hero in England.

    But what’s the cost of beating a Klitschko brother?

    As ****** revealed, Chisora’s contract with Wladimir stipulates that should he win, he will automatically find himself in a second title fight with Klitschko’s older brother, Vitali, for the WBC title. And if Chisora wins again, he’ll be meeting Wladimir in a rematch.
     
  14. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
  15. DrMo

    DrMo Team GB Full Member

    22,198
    20
    Jan 29, 2011
    Haye isnt the only one to confirm it, you should stick to posting about glass jawed disgraces

    Rematch clauses are standard practise, what K2 does is not & behind the scenes they are every bit as ruthless as Don King, but at least he didnt try & hide behind a nice guy image.