David Haye warns Charr about Klits "Slave contract."

Wlad actually got Byrd out of a slave contract with Don King you realize that don't you? It is well documented......

:-(

 

So if a challenger beats Wlad its logical & fair that K2 then run his career for years, choosing opponents, locations & purses.

If there was a pair of Klitschko brothers in every division the sport would be ruined forever

 

Povetkin never signed "SLAVE CONTRACT" either

 

I remember Byrd was OTR talking to ESB live about the slave contracts/



Rico has been pwned

 

Lennox fought Botha in the year 2000 on 3 months rest as a keep busy fight in the UK. At that time Byrd wasnt even allowed exhibitions because he was bonded to what he called a "slave contract" with the Klitschkos. The fight could not happen that year!

 

thumbsup:good:happy

Haye hopefully will get a chance to destroy Vitali, but it's unlikely K2 would take that fight.

 

A lot of whining. Beat the champ, beat the other champ, beat them again. It's only a slave contract if you suffer the consequences of losing.

 

But you, you'd own the belts? You'd get to fight somebody small or slow before stepping up to Wlad?

What happened to fighting like a man? Or does that not happen in your fantasies?

 

False Byrd has a contract with Don King and Universum Boxpromotion!

 

:good

In 2006 Wlad was Byrd´s mandatory but he paid Byrd 4,5 Million so the fight took place in germany and he give Byrd 2 options on his following fights.

 

You can fight whoever you want after you win as a mandatory challenger. Don't you knuckleheads understand that?

It's only if you come in as a nobody like Charr as a voluntary challenger that you have to sign options which I think makes total business sense. It's a good trade-off for both sides.