Officially you only need 3 titles to be heralded as 'undisputed' there's a thread stating it when wlad beat Haye to become undisputed
He is true champion in CW and paper champ in HW , while his paychecks ain cw were paper and in HW were true
Hayes legacy is there, he won the ring belt at cruieserweight, then became heavyweight belt holder, just cause wlad beat him with ease does not mean ****, wlad beats everybody with ease, hell he was beating brewster with ease an also purtiy till he lost his energy, only fight wlad actually lost with out showing any sort of dominance was against sanders, an who could blame him for looking past that golfer. If wlad would of looked past hayes you can bet your life saving wlad would of been KTFO, but wlad instead just put on a clinic, losing no rounds on my score card.
Your score card was bogus then but as for the rest I agree This is another example of a good boxer being written off after one loss
Probably laughing even harder at all those who disliked him and got upset iover his brash arrogant act and paid to see Klitschko beat him.
Boxing is so ****ed. If that's true that its about personal opinion then I also agree Haye wasn't undisputed and just lineal, just as is wlad even though I do believe wlad will get that 4th title when Vitali retires