Simple question did he do better than everyone else vs the Klitschko's since 07? I think so i Had it 117-111 without the KD, he never looked close to getting stopped or Knocked out like all other opponents
BTW he didn't blame his toe for the loss like many of you state, he gives Wlad credit [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjpS8BlwTQI&feature=feedf[/ame]
A bit better than Thompson but not as good as Peter 2005. I was surprised that he took shots so well and despite the fast tempo in the beginning he stayed pretty fresh. Earned my respect.. half way. Delayed entrance and toe showing were kind of silly but not a big deal. Haye/Vitali next...
- Wladimir is more formiddable than in 2005 - The wins have strengthened him mentally and his strong beliefs about his skills have solidified - Defensively Haye was very very good - But his offensive arsenal was very very short-though he did get through a good few times - He just needed to get through 10 times to make the detractors think of him in a more positive light. - Think he should retire - his games based too heavily on his athleticism - and peak athleticism doesn't last too long.
am0kgonzo, Badmoonwulf, crunchpump, Massacre692, Todd498, said worst can any of you explain why and don't say becuase of the hype becuase the question was based on in ring preformance alone
Taking the toe out was obviously a means by which to excuse himself for the loss. You can talk all you want, but the fight's outcome would not be changed either way. It's an excuse.
No way he did, no matter what dodgy stats say. If he got hit by 40% of Wlad's punches, Haye must have a chin made of stone.