David Tua vs Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KTFO, Aug 28, 2007.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    But how exactly does Marciano beat Tua, in your opinion? How does the fight go? I just can't see it. Guys like Ike and Byrd had obvious physical gifts that Marciano lacked, so I'm not sure what those losses prove other than that Tua wasn't invincible. Rahman too.

    This fight is an extremely easy call for me because I simply cannot see a man of Marciano's size, straight-forward style, limited speed, loose defense, and short arms surviving a head-to-head encounter with a man with Tua's hand speed and punching power, especially since he has the chin and stamina to survive anything Marciano throws at him. Really a classic, open-and-shut "styles make fights" matchup, imo.
     
    Monnever likes this.
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    Tua throws way, way less punches than Marciano. He hardly threw a punch against Lewis who is huge, but who Tua, after realising the job of work was too hard, didn't try to fight, because that's the kind of guy he is. Now, it could go the other way - Tua could just hit Rocky and Rocky could fall over. That's definitely not impossible. But Marciano is a little bit taller than Tua. They won't look silly together. The question is, does Tua have SO much power, that Marciano's granite chin get broke on the rare occasions - as I see it - that Tua hits him properly? And I just don't see that. Marciano could be flashed because of balance issues but the evidence is that he was every bit as difficult to really hurt as Tua. Your basically banking upon Tua hitting SO much harder than everyone who ever hit him that Marciano becomes unrecognisable when he gets hit. That's fine - there's nothing wrong with that pick. But it's a hell of a thing to be :good:roll: about. That's a huge presumption to base that kind of pick on.

    My problem with the above is "Rahman too." Rahman was plodding, one-dimensional, and pretty easy to hit. He's a puncher - that's it. But Tua struggled to dominate him - in fact, all we really learned was that Rahman could drop him. So Marciano could too. IMO, Rahman-Tua completely negates your "styles make fights" sum void, and the limitations that you list for Marciano were generally way, way more pronounced in Rahman than Rocky.

    Even against plodding sluggers (and Marciano was way more than that), Tua could be found very wanting due to his limitations. Again, although my bet the house crack was spurious, you seem to be serious about your "open and shut" pick. That, for me, is impossible to take seriously.

    It's a cruiserweight who perfected - perfected - a certain style against a heavyweight who was a failure. I, too, make that an easy pick, but I do allow that Tua hit hard enough to make things weird.
     
  3. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Again, I don't see how the fight against Lewis has any predictive value whatsoever here. Lewis was a giant with stiff straight punches and a solid back foot game. Rocky, of course, is none of the above. Rocky is going to bring the fight to Tua and won't be hard to find at all. Is your theory really that Marciano just cows him into cowardice? Or that he punches at Marciano but somehow can't find him?


    Rahman was a 6'3, 245-lb power-puncher with an 82-inch reach who was never stopped by anyone smaller than Tua. Interesting that you seem to find a mediocre performance against him to be so revealing. What do you make of the close s****es that Marciano had with smaller, far less dangerous fighters over the course his career?
     
    Monnever likes this.
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    PS - Seems rather flippant and a bit disrespectful to call Tua a "failure" but to each his own. Whatever his shortcomings in the ring against an agile 6'1 slickster and various 6'2+/235lb+ giants though, I still haven't seen anything plausibly suggesting that he loses to a slow, sloppy, 180-something-pound, short-armed, straight-ahead brawler.
     
    Monnever likes this.
  5. Webbiano

    Webbiano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,599
    2,495
    Nov 6, 2011
    No disrespect to Tua, but it has been proven that you can beat Tua fighting his fight
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well it's the only time Tua met a fighter in Rocky's class (p4p). And he vanished - he didn't really fight. That's relevant when we match him with ATGs.

    I think that Tua isn't a coward but I don't think he's a natural. I think if he doesn't just bowl Marciano out of there he'll turn in a similar performance here. Marciano was easy to hit but hard to hit clean. Now, if he's in with a great opponent with superb accuracy, excellent technique, the ability to feint Maricano out of position he can be found and it would look easy. But in fact, he takes significant unlocking. Moore and Walcott, two of the best lockpickers in history, were the only guys who really really found him and even they didn't find him much.

    I think Tua wouldn't hit Marciano all that much, properly.

    And Tua was a 5'10 fighter with a 70" reach. His only physical advantage here is poundage. That's it. You've made an awful lot of styles. We're not going to find a fighter who met Tua who was ATG and 186lbs so we work with what we have; Rahman is the closest in style to what you are pinning on Marciano and Tua was awful against him. Rahman's height and reach were hardly enormously important in this fight either.

    That's just it; Tua was often mediocre against great opposition. The exceptions are Ruiz (where he won before being tested) and Ike, where he lost. Again, I can see why the poundage difference - there is no size difference - would give people pause, but I don't get the "it's obvious Tua will win" attitude. I think it makes no sense.

    I think that when Marciano was sorely tested, he won. I think the smaller fighters that tested him - Moore, Walcott, Charles - were all-time p4p greats (and Walcott haha) with exactly the kind of lockpicking skills that Tua never ever exhibited.

    I think that if we're looking at Rocky's worst performances and comparing them to Tua's worst performances, Tua comes off way, way worse. If your'e looking at their best performances, Tua comes off worse.

    Either way it's not an easy pick for Tua. Tua versus any ATG of any style is questionable because Tua was, in the end, a failure. And given his physical abilities, a shocking failure.

    And these guys are eye-to-eye. The notion that all you need to beat Marciano is to be a very hard puncher is preposterous, frankly. Marciano-Lewis, Marciano-Liston, yeah, I can get on board - if not quite agree - with someone saying that those are easy picks, but no also-ran is an easy pick over Rocky.
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,591
    27,258
    Feb 15, 2006
    Tua has lost to everything at world level!

    Fighters who didn’t have exceptional chins.

    Fighters who weren’t particularly big.

    Fighters who weren’t particularly defensively adept.

    The idea that he was this head to head monster, just doesn’t stack up!
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    How do people see Holyfield from the Qawi fight versus Tua going?
     
  9. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Marciano is the greater fighter and there is normally disputing that.

    However if we are being honest with ourselves and taking off the rose tinted classes Tua is the harder hitter, bigger man and likely possessed power rocky never tasted. If Tua can hang with the president then I think he'd be able to take rocky's firepower. How does rocky win here?
     
    Monnever likes this.
  10. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    Holy outboxes him.
     
  11. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Tua's worse performances come off worse than Marciano v. LaStarza I? Marciano almost being stopped on cuts v. Ezzard Charles? I can't see it.
     
  12. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,591
    27,258
    Feb 15, 2006
    It helps if you actually win the fight!

    This has to be factored in, however impressive your biceps are!
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I think that this kind of claim obscures more than it illuminates. Marciano was sorely tested, and won, against aging, small fighters. What is the basis of your claim that one needs to be a master lockpick to "open up" Marciano? At best, seems like a logical fallacy, given that Marciano never faced non-locksmiths with power and handspeed like Tua. I also think it exaggerates how formidable the little guys you mentioned were as heavyweight opponents (no offense to any of them).
     
    Monnever likes this.
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Apparently, he wins here by doing Super Rocky Marciano stuff while a flummoxed, lethargic Tua just stands by idly.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,118
    Mar 21, 2007
    Tbh, this is now reaching voodoo type levels for me.

    Yes, Marciano knocking out all-time great Charles whilst on the brink is better than Tua being depressingly out-boxed by Byrd.

    Yes, not bothering to fight against Lewis was worse than beating LaStarza close.