David Tua vs Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KTFO, Aug 28, 2007.


  1. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    I was admitting that it was a stupid question with an obvious answer. Cheers!
     
  2. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    mmm.. In a p4p sense Moore is greater than Tua but when did he ever prove he could handle the kind of power that Tua possessed? Didn't Moore get bounced around on the canvas 3 times by 173 LB Yvon Durrelle? KO'd by Patterson? Beat down by Ali & Smaller Marciano? You would have to be a fool to think that Tua wasn't more explosive and a harder hitter than Ali, Patterson, Durrelle and Marciano. Tua was putting guys like Ruiz, Rahman, Maskaev, and Oquendo to sleep, all bigger guys than Moore. It's inevitable in this one that Moore would get cracked.

    The older I get the harder it is for me to envision a lot of these Pre 60s heavyweights to compete with hvys of the 90s and the 70s. They not only became bigger but became more advanced and developed more and more tools as time went on. There was nobody like Tua in the 50s.

    Also, this argument that 'Oh, Tua lost to every great/very good heavyweight he fought' well his opposition was 10x stronger than what Rocky had to deal with, Tua getting outboxed by Lewis couldn't be any less relevant here considering how Marcicano stylistically couldn't be any different to Lewis, and lord knows what kind of physical damage Lennox Lewis would do to Marciano's face.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    People always ask this question, no matter who they are picking. It's just not helpful at all. Who did Jones outbox that proved he could outbox Toney? Nobody. Who did Canelo outfight that proved he could outfight Cotto? Nobody. Which master boxers did Tua KO proving he could KO Moore? Absolutely nobody even approaching his quality. Nobody with one tenth of his gifts.

    And that is no less valid than what you just said.

    He did. Didn't David Tua get outboxed by Hasim Rahman? :lol:

    And if you want to argue that those wide scorecards at the time of the stoppage were a result of something other than boxing, what about Chris Byrd?

    Moore was exquisite defensively. It's not "inevitable" that he would get cracked, at all.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Interesting ****ogies. They might work better if we were were comparing Moore to someone his own size though. (answer to the second question is Lara, btw)
     
  5. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    The difference is that those fights actually happened and now we are talking about hypotheticals, but still the point deserves to be addressed. Moore never faced a banger that hit as hard as Tua did at heavyweight that was 225+ LB at his prime. I really think if you take someone like Durelle and put him up against Tua, he gets slaughtered. The size DOES matter, its why weight classes and catch weights exist. It's why the cruiserweight division exists now.

    Which massive punchers did Moore outbox at heavyweight? The answer is nobody approaching Tua's explosiveness, weight, and power. Nobody. In fact the only man that could be barely compared to Tua is Marciano and Rocky stopped him as well. Tua would do him earlier.

    And he also got knocked out, ya. But Rahman was bigger than Moore and hit harder. He had a longer jab. I'm sorry but I just don't rate Moore that highly at heavyweight. He was at his best at light heavy.

    I think it is. Moore was not too fast on his feet as a heavyweight. He could be hit.
     
  6. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Hate to keep bringing up style and size (well, not really) but Moore's defensive style was a type that is far more exquisite and effective against his physical peers (and even then, highly exaggerated in this forum) than larger men who can "run red lights" and physically overwhelm him.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    yes, but the point is that IN THE REAL WORLD, loads and loads and loads and loads and loads of guys who hadn't beaten a guy who did Y as well as X beat that guy. How do address the point? Moore never did it. How to address the opposing point, that Tua never came close - not close, not a hint that it's even possible - to beating a master boxer like Moore. You can't.

    So where does that leave us? None the wiser. It's meaningless.

    Tua never faced a master boxer in his prime.

    I think that Bryd's chances of beating Moore are literally zero. Or whatever the chances are of Moore blowing out a knee or breaking an ankle. What does either one of these opinions prove?

    This is not something that you need to say on this forum. Everyone here knows that and has their own feelings about it. The exact same thing has been stated ten times in this thread.

    Which world class boxers did Tua beat at heavyweight?

    The answer is nobody approaching Moore's skill, generalship and timing. In fct the only man that could be barely compared to Moore is Byrd and Byrd outclassed him. Moore would outclass him more.

    Moore was a better boxer than Rahman and harder to hit. I'm sorry, I jsut don't rate Tua that highly at heavyweight.


    Then your pick is easy.

    Interesting that Moore is so much easier to hit than Byrd but achieved around a hundredth of what Moore managed.
     
  8. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    I'll reply to that Tomorrow McGrain
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    Interestingly, he did extremely well against the best men who were bigger than him (Valdes, Parker, Baker) and less well against the best men he faced who were his "physical peers" (Patterson, Marciano, Charles).

    I'm afraid this post doesn't really reflect reality.
     
  10. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Against heavyweights? "Interesting" is an understatement!!
     
  11. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Ha. So now you're ignoring class altogether when it suits your purposes, eh? And those are your examples of big men who can overwhelm him? Hilarious all around! If you don't understand why a relatively flat-footed shell style is better suited against smaller men than against someone like Tua, I'm going to have to explain it tomorrow.
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,121
    Mar 21, 2007
    No! What is wrong with you? I'm not even making a pick!! I'm just pointing out that what YOU stated was factually incorrect. In order to avoid criticism from you my post apparently would have gone:

    "You are wrong about Moore and his physical peers. I'm also considering class at this time, inexplicably, although it has no baring on the point."

    wtf.

    Those are the actually examples of the actual big men he actually fought in the real world with his style and did extremely well against. They were ranked, just like Tua and like Tua they failed to win a title (though they might have if there was as many belts as Tua had in his era.

    I understand that Moore did very very well with punchers as a rule. I understand that almost everyone who fought him and commented post-Charles talked about how hard he was to hit. I know that what you stated was factually incorrect based upon what actually happened in the real world rather than your opinion on the matter.

    And I know that however "flat-footed" Moore was supposed to be, he was not as flat-footed as Tua.


    You are actually like a comedy poster at this point. You literally went "Ha!" before you made that post.
     
  13. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    What's wrong with you? I pointed out that Moore had a style that would not serve him well against men big and powerful enough to overwhelm him. You suggested that I was wrong with a list of 209-lbers that included a nobody (Parker) and a man with a 25%ish ko rate (Barker). I laughed because I assumed you were being disingenuous. Now that I see that you were being sincere, I take it back. (I also almost laughed just now when you compared them to Tua)
     
  14. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,579
    Jan 30, 2014
    Honest, non-sarcastic aside: When I'm carrying on about the fundamental differences between back-foot and front-foot/flat-footed fighters, and why the former have better prospects against much heavier, powerful front-foot-style opponents, does it seem like gibberish/bs to you?
     
  15. gregluland

    gregluland Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,317
    32
    Apr 20, 2011

    Well I learned something today, a guy with 42 KO's from 49 fights doesn't have a big punch, wonder what made 42 men go to sleep ?