Davies-Napa on Moore-Rhodes undercard

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by punchmaster, Oct 19, 2009.


  1. neil hibbert

    neil hibbert Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,143
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    haha ok mate think youll find me at many a boxing show and my mates being people i dont know!!! stop talking out ure ass lad, ure a lttle forum warrior you! mr vip napa wouldnt have stopped him not a chance! not going to bother responding to daft posts!
     
  2. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    ****ing hell is it that hard to think that in a fight that was relatively close that one or the other won? If there was people ringside who thought that Davies won and people who say Napa won and we only got to see 3/4 of it on TV then it MAY have been close.

    Stop your bickering. You both have different opions get a grip !
     
  3. neil hibbert

    neil hibbert Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,143
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    ano i cant believe im arguing with some tosser on an internet site but at the end of the day he needs to get his facts right before posting things up!!!
     
  4. Leighton T

    Leighton T Active Member Full Member

    816
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    What do you mean he wouldnt have stopped him?? Did you see rounds 11 & 12??? u sure u was at the fight mate?? He had Davies going!!! If u can't see that there's something seriously wrong!!
     
  5. Leighton T

    Leighton T Active Member Full Member

    816
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    Mate im not going to disrespect you because i've seen some of your posts and u kno boxing.... but we saw at least 8-9 rounds of that fight and Napa clearly deserved to win!!
     
  6. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    Fair enough Leighton and i'm not wanting to enter an argument with either of you (that privilige is soley reserved for Gregory or Radab today :lol:) however its obvious you's disagree and this is getting nowhere. 8-9 rounds is around 3/4 though :lol:

    Haven't seen the fight yet but I have spoke with Neil and said beforehand I thought Napa would have too much for him. I'm gonna watch it on Wednesday however to me it seems I was right in my opinion.

    Either way it was a brave step facing Napa in his first defence so Davies gets my regards for that. Napa is a beautiful little boxer in my eyes and i'd like to see him go on from here.
     
  7. neil hibbert

    neil hibbert Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,143
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    yer gary had a terrible 11th round not denying that but if you knew certain facts you would understand, but saying he was outvlassed is what my main problem i because he certainly wasnt outclassed, i a fair poster mate and even gar would tel you that im straight with him and if i thought he lost i would have told him but my opinion is he had it by 2 as he won most of the early rounds.
     
  8. Leighton T

    Leighton T Active Member Full Member

    816
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    Thanks mate u'll see when u get back... U get too see alot of the fight because Rhodes/Moore finished early!!!:thumbsup
     
  9. Leighton T

    Leighton T Active Member Full Member

    816
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    I've got alot of respect for Davies but i just think Napa is a different class to him.. THATS ALL
     
  10. Leighton T

    Leighton T Active Member Full Member

    816
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    Neil doesn't agree...
     
  11. neil hibbert

    neil hibbert Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,143
    0
    Dec 21, 2008
    yer but saying napa nevr got out of 2nd gear and is in a different class when the fight was very close is doing gary a major disservice so obv im going to fight his corner! ive no problem if you think napa won jus with the other stuff
     
  12. Leighton T

    Leighton T Active Member Full Member

    816
    0
    Aug 26, 2009
    Napa is in a different class... It did look like it was easy for him at times!!