Dawson F***ing Sucks

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boom_Boom, May 22, 2011.


  1. blacktopbully

    blacktopbully Boxing Addict banned

    4,703
    1
    May 2, 2011
    joe c would beat him due to dawsons lack of activity he takes a lot of the fight off
     
  2. Justaman

    Justaman Guest

    This
     
  3. pipe wrenched

    pipe wrenched ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    29,921
    35
    Mar 31, 2007

    This too.:deal

    It's a good illustration as why a lot of top p4p fighters do not take these kinds of fights anymore if they don't have to.

    Same for that Lopez dude that Pavlik had to fight. He turned up to be tough as hell.:yep
     
  4. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    dawson is good but he will never be a true p4p fighter till he develops that killer instinct, that drive to succeed when things aren't going his way. That loss to Pascal was inexcusable, it seemed like he gave up in the middle rounds when Pascal put the pressure on him.
     
  5. Exactabox

    Exactabox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,059
    8
    Feb 13, 2010
    Dawson and Andre Ward should flip a coin and the loser retires
     
  6. southpaw333

    southpaw333 New Member Full Member

    88
    7
    May 30, 2010
    It doesn't matter what trainer you put this guy with, he is a heartless fighter happy to win on points in every fight. He should have been going for the KO in the last fight, especially when he is trying to gain a larger fan base. IMO he is a wasted talent that will never reach his full potential... but still a good fighter none the less.
     
  7. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    3
    Oct 30, 2005
    I agree he hasn't been much fun to watch, but check out his resume.

    Dude is 28 years old and has had eight fights against top-10 opponents in his own division, including six in a row. His record in those fights is 7-1, so to say, "he sucks" is pretty stupid, isn't it?

    Also, he has had one great action fight: Johnson I. That bout should put to rest any of the heart questions constantly tossed at him, but again, he hasn't been dominant or exciting the way I thought he may be after the Adamek victory.

    He'll give Hopkins all kinds of problems. That's a 50/50 fight, with Bernard testing Dawson mentally. Chess match, but I like those sometimes. Pair that bout with Pascal/Cloud on the undercard, and you have a great night of boxing.
     
  8. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    exactly. Dawson has been fighting guys that have never been stopped, back to back to back, what do fans expect? He just easily beat a recent former champ after a long layoff and with a new trainer. Nothing to get worried about, he lost some rust and picked up an easy W. Lets see how he progresses through his next couple fights before we cast judgement on him.
     
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    He will have a problem with Hopkins..................
     
  10. Ripple633

    Ripple633 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,635
    1
    Jun 2, 2009
    What does that say about the rest of his opponents he has beaten? (Adamek, Tarver, Diaconu, Johnson) I guess they suck too.

    Anyways Dawson looked scared to engage with Diaconu, I don't know why because he took Diaconu shots without being close to getting knocked down.
     
  11. newby johnson

    newby johnson Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,147
    78
    Jun 25, 2009
    He's talented as hell - speed, skills, reach, but in his last fight, it seems like he lacks a little bit of blood in the veins. Like Abraham nowdays, not exactly bursting with desire.
     
  12. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Dawson is just a frustrating guy to watch but he is clearly very talented. He puts punches together very well, and moves well and reacts well defensively to punches for a lanky *******.

    He just lacks a fighters mindset, he has no killer instinct and he is happy to do the bare minimum in the ring. If he had a more diligent mindset in the ring or a more fiery one he would be more effective and much more crowd pleasing. Talent gets brought up a lot with guys who have the obvious physical traits but not the mental traits as they are much more tangible.
     
  13. mRD

    mRD vagabond Full Member

    578
    0
    Nov 14, 2010
    B-Hop would whoop Bad Chad's hypejob ass, and everyone jumps on the B-Hop all time great bandwagon
     
  14. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    Dawson has one loss, and a solid resume. He may not be the complete package, but he's pretty damn good anyway.

    A lot of good fighters get accused of being boring. Wladimir, Ward, Hopkins and even Mayweather etc. Those are the kind of guys who will have great legacies. Sometimes being good is better than being exciting.

    Half of the people who chant "boring" have the attention span of a bag of dicks. Sure, Chad may be frustrating, but if he can keep fighting good competition and keep winning, then anyone who is worth a damn will respect him anyway.
     
  15. saintsmike

    saintsmike Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,339
    507
    Nov 26, 2005
    Hell no, just because he lost about 4 rounds against a very GAME Diacanu doesn't mean he sucks! he was on the verge of possibly stopping Pascal too. I agree he isn't aggressive enough at times, but he's an excellent boxer, very good handspeed and great footwork. Yes he lacks a bit of "willpower" and willingness to trade on the inside but that isn't his type of fighting. He would still lose to Hopkins but he'll probably provide more of a test than Pascal did.