Never been a DLH fan to start, but the man fought only the best. The only fighter he never fought that i wanted him to was winky, but other than that he def wins legacy wise. Dont get me wrong, Pac has one hell of a resume.
They are about equal. DLH has some losses to top comp but he fought the better competition overall. There's no way Tito won that fight. The other fights were close, but if he's gonna add JMM as a Pac win, not saying it wasn't, then he can add Pernell and Ike.
What objective standards? im not talking about who i tought won those fights im mentioning what is actually in they're records and that means that DLH lost to Tito and th rematch with Mosley and Pac beat JMM.
Yeah but you're also bitching about DLH losing to Ike and SweetPea; Aren't those DLH wins "on the records"? That's what I mean by objective standards(sarcasm), you can't have it both ways it makes you look like a *******:deal
I was just responding to a guy that said the Tito and Mosley II were robberies and that the same can be said about the Quartey and Whitaker fights. I didnt even talked about Pac until you mentioned the JMM fight.
Pacquaio not even close, whether its on ESB or ESPN or Ring MAg the next time they come out with a list.
agree w/ you, he fought hopkins, mosley, trinidad, mayweather and pacman. he fought only the best..., but........
Time will tell Pac is only 30. I know he doesn't intend to fight much longer but his biggest fights are still to come. Ask that question in 5 years. Either he will have cleaned up the WW division or been cleaned out.
DLH should never be as rich & famous as he is based on his boxing ability... Pacquiao should go down as the better fighter IMO.
The decisions were wrong tho, I thought he beat Tito & SSM the 2nd time.... but either way, Pacquiao is still better IMO.
Pac is 30 and already has 3 losses and 2 draws and his competition will be tougher from now on. DLH @30 also had 3 losses(to better fighters):deal