I think a lot of people forget how good this guy was. Trying to identify his absolute prime is quite difficult. As a young, strong, one handed fighter in the 90's, he was pretty impressive against a range of opposition. But I'd say when he started working with Floyd Sr, he become more of a good all rounder. So from Gatti to the 2nd fight with Mosley, I think he was at his absolute peak. Funny how perceptions of DLH are now these days, "overrated", "lost all his big fights" etc.
Yeah, I've gone over this with so many people it's crazy. And I don't even particularly like the guy. I just can't see how people can be so blinded about his very high place in boxing history.
I actually think De La Hoya is slightly under regarded. What a record! What a list of names on his resume. And supreme speed and skills in his prime. A complete fighter. Something special for sure. Top 100 of all time easily.
oscar was decent but nothin special. people just liked his pretty face and had school girl crushes on him. Overrated and lost all of his big fights are two very accurate things to say about him. Don't let the love blind you mu****as.
In retrospect, I he was a very good fighter, a near great but with the new trend of weight hoping its hard to say where he was at his best. He was more dominant in the lower weights and at welterweight he had mixed results.....I dont hold the loses to Mayweather and especially Pacquaio over his head. IMO he beat Trinidad he won at least 6-7 rounds clearly and at least deserved a a draw...damn you Don King....fought a closet classic with Ike Quartey another near great, Shane Mosley had his number in his prime but he went his entire prime with one clear loss in the first Mosley fight. He fought 20 world champions defeated 13-15 and only lost. He always fought the best and deserves credit for it. Had he beaten Trinidad or Mosley he'd probably get his due as an outstanding fighter. What hurt him IMO is the inconsistency of his team... This content is protected
Someone once called him the modern day Roberto Duran, in terms of legacy. He didn't win all of them but gave us great accounts of himself each time.
I think people just have short memories, and/or struggle to see the big picture of his career, instead choosing to judge him solely on the ageing part-time fighter he became in the last few years of his career (really from SSM 2 onwards).
He lost all of his big fights? So, you don't consider his two fights with JC Chavez and his fight with Pernell Whitaker to be big? Two future HOFers who were current champs? Two gigantic names? Not big fights? Yeah, we're all blind. Sho'nuff.
I dont even know what to think of Phony Boy,yes he fought everybody and i respect that, but he also lost most of his big fights and even the ones he won were either controversial or against past his best fighters,did he ever beat a great fighter that was in his prime?
Did a fighter ever decisively beat him in his own prime age and weight? Another way to look at it. So, that Chavez and Whitaker were past their prime is an issue, but it's not an issue that Mayweather and Pacquiao beat him past his own prime? Double standard, sounds like.
He fought the following... Jorge Paez Pernell Whitaker Julio Cesar Chavez Hector Camacho Ike Quartey Felix Trinidad Shane Mosley Arturo Gatti Fernando Vargas Bernard Hopkins Floyd Mayweather Jr Manny Pacquiao ...and people have the nerve to call him a ***** and a homo
never seen the fight, but for what I heard he lost clearly....IMO he had no business at middleweight anyway.