De La Hoya's boxing useless against Pacman but effective against Floyd. LOOK!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by vegasdude, Sep 24, 2009.


  1. vegasdude

    vegasdude Speed is Power! Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 31, 2006
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Viuaf8aLWoU

    As you can clearly see, Pacman's speed and power neutralized DLH's technical boxing ability.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dss8VYRjxKo

    Floyd was not able to hurt DLH and clearly bother by DLH's great technical boxing skills.

    DLH in my opinion should have won the controversial split decision.

    Remember
    1. DLH was favored and lost convincingly against PAC.
    2. PBF was favored but barely won by a split decision.
     
  2. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    Your statements are true. However, if you are implying that this is a good reason to pick Pacquiao over Mayweather...then it is going to be a loooooong night for you. Run while you can. Or maybe clarify what the point is.
     
  3. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
  4. David Fanning

    David Fanning Internet Tuff Guy Full Member

    9,562
    2
    Aug 22, 2009
    I agree with your first statement, I just kept it to myself. I'll break this guy down with facts and clear cut points if he takes the bait...but why the name calling?
     
  5. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
  6. Fighting Pride

    Fighting Pride Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,538
    1
    Feb 12, 2009
    LOL, this is in reply to the thread about JMM counterpunching's being useless against Floyd, but effective against Pac
     
  7. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  8. vegasdude

    vegasdude Speed is Power! Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 31, 2006
    ha ha ha... is that your best arguement you troll.
     
  9. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,244
    2,185
    Jun 24, 2007
    The weight comes into play big time.........Floyd moved up and felt good Oscar moved down and felt horrible...The Difference showed
     
  10. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    You think this guy would think differently if you break him down? You must not know ESB poster well enough. Just get to the point and call him a ****** and move on. Any more time spent on this troll is waste of life.
     
  11. vegasdude

    vegasdude Speed is Power! Full Member

    1,432
    0
    Jan 31, 2006
    :D

    But more convincing.

    DLH was favored to win against PAC and he got obliterated.
    PBF was favored and under performed due to DLH technical ability.

    :D
     
  12. MIP4P1

    MIP4P1 Maestro Full Member

    814
    0
    Sep 18, 2009
    It speaks volumes when Pacquiao isn't even favored against a boxer who had to lose 20lbs.

    Also, Oscar only won 4 rounds against Floyd, despite his 20lb weight advantage.

    Pacquiao arguably lost twice to JM Marquez despite having the size advantage, but Floyd won every round.
     
  13. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    Oscar was a walking corpse when he fought pac fool. Horrible argument not even worth my time.
     
  14. jsimon

    jsimon Member Full Member

    428
    0
    Jun 12, 2005
    Pac should have fought Oscar at 154 with 10 ounce gloves then we can make a arguement. Plus Oscar has fought at 147 since he last fought Gatti in 2000 nine years ago.
     
  15. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    not to mention that the ring was tiny as hell so floyd can't use his legs.