Dear Chin Checkers...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MrStayman, Oct 15, 2007.


  1. MrStayman

    MrStayman Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    0
    Jun 2, 2007
    Pavlik gets knocked down and hurt from 14 (about 8 of which landed) consecutive power punches from Taylor and his chin rating goes from "good" to "average."

    Andrade gets knocked down and hurt from a single punch from Mack and his chin rating goes from "titanium" to "titanium."

    Peter gets knocked down and hurt three times against mccline and his chin rating goes from "iron" to "good."

    Explain please.
     
  2. Boinko

    Boinko Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    0
    Oct 2, 2004
    I'm not sure you can really read to much into Andrade's knockdown. It's not like he was really hurt. He got caught very clean and went down, but showed in the remainder of the fight that he has an excellent chin.

    As for Peter, I think he needs to be downgraded to average. McCline is not a puncher, and he had Peter reeling.

    Pavlik's chin is still good. He weathered a hell of a lot of punches from Taylor.

    It is possible for guys with good chins to get knocked down once in awhile. There seems to be this prevailing attitude among some fans that if you even get slightly wobbled or suffer a flash knockdown suddenly your chin sucks.
     
  3. MrStayman

    MrStayman Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    0
    Jun 2, 2007
    I agree on all points. I'm aiming this post at those who employ a double standard by downgrading Pavlik's chin.

    Andrade wasn't hurt bad but it did affect and him and it was a legit knockdown. His legs weren't fully back since he got put slightly off balance by a couple of punches over the next half a minute. I agree that his chin held up fine for the rest of the fight. But I thought Pavlik showed a pretty good chin too. He got hit by a huge number of shots.
     
  4. PolishPummler

    PolishPummler Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,752
    4
    Oct 15, 2005
    It all depends on how much they like the fighters.
     
  5. Words

    Words Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,018
    6
    Apr 21, 2007
    Whilst we have the chin-checkers opinion's, I'd like to ask how they'd rate the following fighters beards out of ten:

    Manny Pacqauio

    Wlad Klitschko
    Jean-Marc Mormeck
    Darnell Wilson
    David Haye
    Enzo Maccarinelli
    Ricky Hatton
    Floyd Mayweather
    Bernard Hopkins
    Joe Calzaghe
    Miguel Cotto
    Shane Mosley
     
  6. AbbeyFN

    AbbeyFN Active Member Full Member

    982
    0
    May 5, 2007
    Pavlik has a chin of steel. When you look at the hits he took the first couple were right on and would have floored a mere mortal.

    As for Peter his chin is still rock solid. McCline hit hit with all of his weight behind it and I don't care who you are - if a 278lb man smacks you straight on even a steel chin is going to get dented.

    Andrade is weak.
     
  7. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    True. :yep
     
  8. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Andrade dropped from 'titanium' to 'cast iron'. For example, peak Holyfield was cast iron, McCall was titanium.

    Peter dropped from a percieved 'iron', to 'average'.
     
  9. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Manny Pacqauio - Good

    Wlad Klitschko - Shaky

    Jean-Marc Mormeck - Average

    Darnell Wilson - Iron

    David Haye - Shaky

    Enzo Maccarinelli - Glass

    Ricky Hatton - Good

    Floyd Mayweather - Good

    Bernard Hopkins - Iron

    Joe Calzaghe - Good

    Miguel Cotto - Average

    Shane Mosley - Good
     
  10. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,863
    3,110
    Apr 16, 2005
    All knockdowns are NOT created equal. Some are relatively minor like the Andrade KD, and therefore shouldn't count too much against a fighter's chin rating - others seem more serious, like the KDs suffered by Pavlik and Peter, and therefore should be factored in.

    As far as Peter is concerned, the jury's still out. I've been up front in placing Peter on the "questionable" list. It remains to be seen if the McCline KDs were a fluke, and what was really signficant was Peter's recuperative ability, or whether they indicate that his beard is worse than seems to be the case based on his OVERALL career to date.

    Similarly, Pavlik - who had been down before, btw, accounting for his lower rating prior to the Taylor fight - is also a fighter who belongs on the "questionable" list. It could be that he is one of these guys who can get decked, but has enough heart and recuperative ability to get up. As with Peter, we need to see how his career plays out to know for sure.

    In sum, on both Peter and Pavlik, the jury's still out and both their chins are, imo, "questionable" at this point.:yep
     
  11. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    Are you ******ed???? Andrade has to have by far the sturdiest chin in boxing right now. He has got a freaking beard! ITS OK FOR FIGHTERS TO GO DOWN after getting hit alot of things can attribute to that not just the chin alone. if your still questioning Andrades chin look at the rest of the fight or the Kessler fight. that was 12 rounds of pure Punching practice for Kessler.
     
  12. MrStayman

    MrStayman Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    0
    Jun 2, 2007
    Alright, I guess there is no double standard then. Sorry for the false accusation! You guys are just very harsh with your chinchecking :shock:.


    While you're here, I have a question about the Amsterdam-Zakman chinchecking system. Sometimes you deduct a grade for knockdowns, and sometimes you reach for the "suspect" list. Can a chin be on both the "suspect" list and the "iron" list at the same time? Also, is it possible for a knockdown to not affect a chin rating?
     
  13. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    :yep
     
  14. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,863
    3,110
    Apr 16, 2005
    Yeah, we're bigtime tough - which you should be, imo. Too many boxing fans want to give fighters a pass for their mediocre punch resistance. They offer all kind of excuses. My favorite it "that punch woulda knocked out ANYONE!" :patsch :lol: Yeah, sure - prove it! :deal

    And yeah, we try to be as "fair" as possible - which is why these questions about "double standards" needed to be addressed promptly! But chinchecking, like any aspect of boxing evaluation, involves a certain degree of interpretation. SOme of the things that need to be considered are:

    1. How damaging were the knockdowns a fighter suffered (obviously, flash knockdowns count for less than fighters who are put on ***** street)?

    2. Was the fighter scoring the KD/KO a puncher, as indicated by things like their knockout ratio, reputation, etc.

    3. How may times has a fighter been stopped? Were they TKOs or legitimate count-outs (KTFO)? Was the fighter unconscious and/or off his feet? Obviously a fighter getting KTFO counts for more against their chin than a TKO. A stoppage while unconscious counts for more than a stoppage while standing.

    These are just some of the primary elements that might be examined. But basically this covers it. In answer to your specific questions, then, I would say it is probably unlikely that a fighter's chin would be considered "suspect" while still being rated "iron" and yes, it is possible for a knockdown to not affect a chin rating (this, obviously, would be likely only where the KDs are of the "flash" variety).

    If you're interested in a more detailed discussion of this subject, check out my post outlining the essential methodology of chin-checking in the Classic Section:

    www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=476295&postcount=28
     
  15. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    Good