Dear Taylor apologists, here is another scenerio for you and more angles.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Amsterdam, Sep 2, 2007.


  1. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    His competition can certainly be put into perspective at least.
     
  2. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    I hope you realize how stupid it is, accusing someone of something and then do it yourself.

    Please find a mirror before you post again. Thank you.
     
  3. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    Actually, you have no clue. The fights have never happened, and never will happen that you are proclaiming so matter-of-factly. The only thing you can go by is what has actually happened.

    You like to assume that fights would go down a certain way, when in fact you're basing them on nothing but hatred for one fighter.
     
  4. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    Your post is wrong on so many levels.

    Since hindsight is a good way of establishing fact, it does give us some clue concerning a fighter. The evidence presented makes it possible to predict the possible outcome of fights - with a small margin of error(as Amsterdam says).

    Since you are only hindsighting, I find it contradictive of you to say that the fights will never happen.

    Amsterdam may have hatred for Taylor, but since its based on hindsighting on events that has taken place, they are more nuanced that you claim them to be, as explained in his post.

    I bet you never listen to the weather-forecasts.
     
  5. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,049
    1,098
    Aug 6, 2005
    It's highly doubtful that Abraham ever fights Spinks or Ouma. I'd say pretty much zero chance those fights ever get made.

    Even worse is saying that if they happened that Abraham would KO them both easily.

    Nothing Abraham has done has proved he can take out elite level fighters.

    Keep on making **** up though if it makes you feel good, just wish you'd stop posting it on here like it's some kind of fact.
     
  6. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Amsterdam, you have officially become a HATER.
     
  7. Lampley

    Lampley Boxing Junkie banned

    7,508
    3
    Oct 30, 2005
    Taylor very well may lose to Pavlik, but his resume is bounds better than that of Abraham.

    If you want to argue that AA > Taylor, then fine. But if you want to argue the strength of their opposition, me have their records available to us as objective evidence.

    And objectively, it's going to be difficult making the argument that Abraham's credentials match those of Taylor. The fact that you need to offer up hypothetical early KO scenarios in favor of Abraham essentially proves my point.

    As a matter of record, Taylor clearly is the most proven fighter of the three.
     
  8. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Ah, so Spinks and Ouma are elite MW's?:yep

    Abraham seems to be dealing with natural MW's just fine, natural MW's who are on the skill level or better of the smaller LMW's and WW's that Taylor enjoys.

    Christ you people amuse me with your material.