Debunking the myth that is Carl Froch

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by DeathEater, Mar 29, 2015.


  1. DeathEater

    DeathEater Active Member Full Member

    947
    2
    Dec 27, 2012
    He ducked Degale...
     
  2. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,111
    Sep 21, 2013
    I respect Carl for fighting everyone, but this is the truth.

    Although I did think Bute was going to cause him problems, Kessler was on the verge of getting stopped in the rematch and he should have fought Degale.

    But I do agree with what you're saying, although I find Froch entertaining and great value for money.
     
  3. Barry Smith

    Barry Smith Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,570
    23
    Aug 13, 2012
    Welcome to the internet, where some no mark nerd like D1ckEater can call World level fighters like Pascal and Bute frauds and bums from behind the safety of his keyboard.
     
  4. mithffg

    mithffg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,816
    167
    Feb 22, 2007
    Guarantee the op is a big bearded stinking muzzer.
     
  5. the factor

    the factor Active Member banned Full Member

    694
    340
    Sep 13, 2014
    Ward, Taylor Kessler Dirrel Calzaghe
     
  6. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,098
    Jul 19, 2004
    Froch is no myth. I have to give him credit for fighting in other fighter's back yards, while Ward will only fight in his home town, with his personal referee, judges, boxing commission, etc., by they way, if
    Ward wants a big fight he should fight Stevenson
    ASAP. before Kovalev knocks him out.................Stevenson will fight Ward at 168, but Ward still refuses to do such. According to Ward, Kovalev is too big, yet Ward fought as a light heavyweight while an amateur................................Ward is a legend in his own mind...................
     
  7. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    4,307
    Aug 2, 2013
    He is very over-rated, arguably lost to Pascal and Dirrell, both whom didn't even have a set of basic fundamentals, and arguably lost to a 45-year-old Glen Johnson, who was never very good in the first place. Ward won every minute of every round.
     
  8. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,111
    Sep 21, 2013
    Dirrell is a fantastic boxer!
     
  9. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    4,307
    Aug 2, 2013
    Against dead bodies
     
  10. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    :patsch

    I was correct about where you talk out of.
     
  11. Two Shakes

    Two Shakes Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,927
    176
    Sep 7, 2008
    In order .....

    Pascal is tough, and very awkward, he also had more gas at 168.

    Dirrell is/was a very talented fighter, quick, slick, heavy handed, but lacking a pair of Cajones.

    He was a clear winner against Pascal.

    Got the nod against Dirrell in a messy controversial fight.

    Won at least 8 rounds against Johnson.

    And made Ward fight for every minute of every round in a hard fought fight he lost clearly. He most certainly didn't lose every round.

    You really should stop posting on boxing websites, you are clueless.
     
  12. DeathEater

    DeathEater Active Member Full Member

    947
    2
    Dec 27, 2012
    "Made Wars fight every minute of every round"....


    Loool !! Ward won EVERY round. Even his blind fans gave him a maximum of two. Froch was destroyed. Way more embarrassing then an early KO