Heavyweight--Louis vs Johnson (or Jeffries) 5-1 Lightheavy--Lewis vs Fitzsimmons/Langford 0-7 Middle--Steele (or several others) vs Ketchel 3-4 Welter--Ross vs Walcott 3-2 Light--Canzoneri vs Gans 2-4 Feather--Armstrong vs McGovern 5-1 Bantam--Panama Al Brown vs Frankie Neil/McGovern 4 -0 Current Score - 1930s 4 vs 1900s 3
Heavyweight--Louis vs Johnson (or Jeffries) Lightheavy--Rosenbloom vs Fitzsimmons Middle--Thill vs Ketchel Welter--Ross vs Walcott Light--Canzoneri vs Gans Feather--Armstrong vs McGovern Bantam--Panama Al Brown vs Frankie Neil Fly--void-no flyweight division in 1900's
Heavyweight--Louis vs Johnson (or Jeffries) 6-1 Lightheavy--Lewis vs Fitzsimmons/Langford 0-8 Middle--Steele (or several others) vs Ketchel 3-5 Welter--Ross vs Walcott 4-2 Light--Canzoneri vs Gans 3-4 Feather--Armstrong vs McGovern 6-1 Bantam--Panama Al Brown vs Frankie Neil/McGovern 5 -0 Current Score - 1930s 4 vs 1900s 3 Final Score - 30s through to the next round
By Ko??? In over 80 fights, Barney Ross was never knock out, We are talking about one of the atg's in chins right here. I dont see Walcott doing what others had failed. I also think Ross would outbox Walcott imo.
Yeah it isnt a bad point. I got maybe a bit carried away. Walcott fought heavier opponents and arguably even better, but this was sometimes to his undoing particularly as he got older. Ross is a great, also, though i dont think he fought the bigger punchers that Walcott did. Either way, it looks like the majority is in your favour.