December 1967 'WBA Heavyweight Rankings'

None.

 

The WBA had Frazier ranked so low because they dropped him from #1 to #7 after he refused to participate in their tournament. These ratings are deceptive.

 

Italy didnt exactly have the most sterling reputation when it came to its handling of boxing. It still doesnt quite frankly.

Another knock against it and reason why a lot of fighters didnt jump at the chance to fight there was the fact that they allowed the EBU to govern their rules. This was seen by many fighters in the USA as a detriment.


Compare the supposed offers being thrown Ali's way to fight in Italy against cold hard numbers of what was actually being paid to fighters in Italy, and what Ali was making elsewhere and then tell me it was a realistic to expect him to go fight Corletti there.

Yup, everyone was scared of a guy who struggled with even his modest level of competition. When Chuvalo is the best guy youve beaten you may want to rethink claiming you are being ducked.

 

I knew it. Ali ducked Zyglewicz...........

 

This is why some of us really appreciate Senor Pepe's threads. He gives recognition to fighters who are rarely mentioned.

And even though he offers a critical view of Muhammad Ali, he sure as hell provides more interesting an original material on Ali and his era than any of the 'hardcore' Ali fans on here.
I mean, the Ali fans on here never have anything much to say that can't be found on the sports book shelf on any decent book shop.
I've rarely seen the big Ali fans on here even acknowledge Ali's amateur career in any sort of detail, for example.
I welcome anything of that sort from Ali's fans. But Senor Pepe is the only one making the effort. :good

 

Hate is a great motivator. Pepe brings a passion that so many lack.

 

None of them. The mid to late 60's was a little light on talent in the heavyweight divison. Frazier was not a force until the end of the 1960's, and Patterson had back issues.

Quarry and Terrell were solid, but would not do well vs. either Klitschko.

[url]Ring magazine rankings for 1966:
[/url]
Ernie Terrell
Zora Folley
Thad Spencer
Floyd Patterson
Karl Mildenberger
Joe Frazier
Oscar Bonavena
George Chuvalo
Johnny Persol
Manuel Ramos

This content is protected

: (by the time this came out, Ali was about to be sent into exile)

Muhammad Ali, Champion

Joe Frazier
Thad Spencer
Jimmy Ellis
Manuel Ramos
Jerry Quarry
Oscar Bonavena
Floyd Patterson
Hector Eduardo Corletti
Karl Mildenberger
Ernie Terrell

 

Go back to the current forum dame, and realize that different era comparisons can be almost impossible to compare.
Ex: In 1960 your Klit boys would a more gangly 220-225-ish.
In 2000, Patterson would have been a more chisled 205'er.
Enough of the period comparisons.

 

And you continue your Thad nonsense...

 

I agree, your Thad isn't there, considering he had just gotten ass-wiped by Quarry and would never win another fight.
Hey, no Patterson? My beloved childhood hero would step into the Stockholm ring at this time and, perhaps, beat Ellis. Ramos? Lewis? Clark? Corletti? "not a bad ranking?" Get real, an aging Floyd would have waxed the lot.
AGAIN! **** on your Cassius obsession, **** on your contenders being better than they are and bring us some substantive threads based on your obvious knowledge of boxing.