Defamation suit lurks as likely roadblock to Pacquiao-Mayweather

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by HMSTempleGarden, May 18, 2010.


  1. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007

    They have NO CASE. You can't say "Manny being a public figure has no bearing" in a case that is specifically related to Manny suing over "public defamation of character resulting in harm." The fact that he is a celebrity/sports icon has a HUGE BEARING on the case and could not be ignored by any responsible court.

    How do you prove that they knew, without a doubt, that Manny is not on some form of PED? Do the Mayweathers work for Manny and know everything about him? How do you PROVE they knew he was not on anything? Not only do you have to prove they knew WITHOUT A DOUBT that Manny was drug free, you have to ALSO prove that they knowingly did it with the INTENT OF HARMING PACQUIAO.

    Impossible to prove, they have no case. Another smoke screen for Manny to dodge a drug test. People who actually believe he has a case need to go read the laws around this.

    The Mayweathers stated their opinion, and that is their right to do so as it is protected by the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

    If Manny would take the drug tests, these opinions would probably go away. The only person to blame for all of this, is Manny Pacquiao for all his ducking, running, hiding, and double talk regarding drug testing.
     
  2. Stezzie

    Stezzie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,277
    1
    Dec 23, 2004
    Its not a bargaining chip...maybe in the court of public opinion but not towards negotiations... Its literally nonsense and flimsy at best... Why do you think the defendants could care less about it? They haven't changed their tune one bit. Thats on 24/7...after the suit...

    Its just a gimmick and anyone with half a brain can figure that out...This site is amazing...You have people saying Pac is not a public figure yet he has Nike endorsements... Thats hilarious...
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    in that case then the lawsuit has no bearing on the negotiations for their november fight.
     
  4. victor879

    victor879 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,017
    42
    Dec 1, 2007

    It does when you're trying to do business with somebody. :lol:

    Kind of hard to have a civil business negotiation when one party has a frivolous lawsuit against the other. :patsch

    For example: If you have some bogus lawsuit out on me, why in hell should I do business with you? :think
     
  5. J.E.Cash

    J.E.Cash Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,302
    8
    May 5, 2009
    Thank you for that :good. I was going to begin trying to prove why Pac would be considered a public figure, and saw your post so you saved me the work.
     
  6. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    2
    Apr 19, 2007
    i believe the opposite...I BELIEVE IN FLOYDS OPINION IS THAT PAC IS REALLY USING PED'S..IF HE HONESTLY BELIEVES THAT (AND WHO IS ANYONE TO TELL ANYONE WHAT THEY DO AND DONT BELIEVE) THAN THERE IS NO SHAME IN ASKING FOR THE TESTS AT ALL..AFTER ALL..IN FLOYDS MIND MANNY IS ON PEDS..
     
  7. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    That defamation suit means nothing. If anything it is being used by Pac to get out of fighting. Who sues a guy for $75K on that level? Mayweather probably blows that amount on his kid's birthday parties.

    Pac and almost all the guys he associate with are jokes on a mental level. So is anyone who believes or supports this nonsense.
     
  8. RAW

    RAW Active Member Full Member

    1,208
    0
    Mar 26, 2010
    lol. Would you help somepne get paid if they were suing you? Obviously not. The case is weak. & floyd has never actually accused pac. Roger & sr may have but floyd never did, so the suit is weak. You can sue anybody for anything in these courts. Doesn't mean you'll win.
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    It doesn't. It is only for $75K anyway. Mayweather HAPPILY paid $300K for each pound against JMM. You think that BS is stopping a fight on Mayweather's end? :roll:

    Arum is going to use that lawsuit as the reason why the fight doesn't come off and you *******s are going to lap it up like kittens do warm milk. :deal
     
  10. boxon123

    boxon123 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,040
    72
    Nov 28, 2004
    Does that mean Sr and Jr believe Pac is on drugs that make u bulletproof? Or is that part of there insanity defense for the lawsuit .
     
  11. boxon123

    boxon123 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,040
    72
    Nov 28, 2004
    Who talks about things they know nothing about ? The $75 k figure has been explained 50 times.
     
  12. footballfan098

    footballfan098 Member Full Member

    260
    0
    Dec 22, 2009
    I love it when people with no law background try to talk about it. Continue on.
     
  13. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007
    The way it sounds is the law is **** and immoral if there really are double standards for celebrities and non-celebrities. Individual freedom unless you become famous? So much for equal protection under the law.
     
  14. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    By who? When?

    The lawsuit is BS and anyone with half a brain knows it. That crap won't make it to court for another 4 years, but it will keep anyone who is broke from speaking on Pac's cheating... ahem I mean suspicious behavior.
     
  15. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    No. It is different if you make your money by being a public figure.