Defensive masters ..Whitaker vs Mayweather

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by burt bienstock, Mar 4, 2010.


  1. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    Roy Jones (besides Tarver ;) )
     
  2. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Yeah maybe, you have a point.
     
  3. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Respect! I expected you to pop in and somehow justify a Mayweather win :D


    That's what I also think. Mayweather kept his full mobileness and speed at welter while Whitaker lost a step. This would be an even match-up.
     
  4. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    Mayweather may've kept his speed, but he lost his offensive efficiency, whereas Whitaker if anything increased his due to his lesser physical tools. I think Whitaker beats Floyd at any weight from 135-147, clearly.
     
  5. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Yeah, Mayweather got more cautious but I think he may potshot himself to a close win. Wouldn't make him the favourite but neither would I make Whitaker.
     
  6. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Very close fight at any time or weight they meet IMO.

    This would be a tactical, masterful boxing match in the mould of a Pea-Mcgirt I or SRL-Benitez fight.

    Both guys are amongst the best pure boxers & defensive specialists of all time, safety first but more than capable of a great offence.

    Pea has the better jab & is a more fluid combination puncher, FMJ has a bit more pop & is a tad quicker throwing single shots & is a little better of an athlete IMO.

    I say Whitaker takes 6 out of 10 but I wouldnt be betting big either way.

    I know this prediction will be a terrible piece of news for most classic posters but it is what it is, I call it the way I feel it would go.
     
  7. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    In terms of technique it is not blasphemous to say Mayweather is better in some areas, his defence from a technical standpoint is near perfect, that's not to say it is better than Whitakers. Whitaker was like something from the matrix, his reflexes are better than Mayweathers. For me why Whitaker is better is because of his ability to force a fight on the front foot. Mayweather is versatile and adaptable and can fight inside, but his inside game is mainly about countering. Whitaker has that extra measure of versatility in being able to act as the stronger man in a fight, and battle away inside to push his man back. Whitaker has the better jab, and is one of the very best ring generals ever. I'm going for him. Mayweather gets a rough ride here though, i reserve that.
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Bernard Hopkins