Definition: When is a champion "undisputed"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by madballster, Jun 29, 2014.


  1. madballster

    madballster Loyal Member Full Member

    37,210
    6,765
    Jul 21, 2009
    With the ABC title soup we have fewer and fewer undisputed champions. The WBA proposed now to designate a champion undisputed status if he holds 3 (not 4) of the 4 major belts.

    "According to the WBA rules, unified champions hold two titles. An undisputed champion holds three titles."

    Opinions?
     
  2. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Maybe they still don't recognize the wbo?
     
  3. damian38

    damian38 BigDramaShow Full Member

    25,548
    203
    Sep 11, 2011
    the WBA shouldn't be talkiing about unified or undisputed champions with their multiple Interm, World, Super and other joke titles
     
  4. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    92,923
    27,663
    Jan 18, 2010
    And yet the WBA hands out multiple "world title" belts of their own in a single division, even when they consider a champ undisputed. Just look at the Chagaev vs Oquendo fight for their bogus Regular Bowel Movement belt.

    I still think the undisputed mark should only be given to the holder of all major belts IF he's also the linear champ.
    And I also am a strong supporter of when a belt gets vacant a multiple beltholder should get the chance to fight for that vacant belt in his next bout against the #1 of that organisation to make it easier to create real champions in the divisions and preventing milking of vacant belts.
     
  5. Koba

    Koba Whimsical Inactivisist Full Member

    8,548
    96
    Apr 28, 2013
    Yeah, this ^. They've been in discussions with the WBC and IBF regarding working together to get unified champs, but the WBO hasn't been invited to the party.

    Pretty much BS really IMO as the WBO has a decent set of titlists, and as pointed out, the proliferation of WBA straps is itself a joke.

    I mean in principle I like the idea of fewer recognised belts and a push to unify, but I don't like the idea of simply taking guys like Crawford, Kovalev, Rigo, Loma, Huck, Andrade, Pac, Mikey Garcia (hell, even Abraham and Quillin) out of the running - which this would effectively do.

    I wouldn't consider a WBC / WBA / IBF unified champ exactly 'undisputed' with a talent pool like that willing and ready to dispute it.

    Curiously, though probably co-incidentally, there's a preponderance of HBO and TR fighters on the list of WBO titlists which may impact on how things play out, especially if there is any truth to rumours of SHOs financial troubles.
     
  6. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,142
    5,687
    Oct 5, 2009
    I think undisputed has to do with recognition

    There's a bunch of belt holders but at most weights any reasonable observer can determine who the best is even without unification
     
  7. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    92,923
    27,663
    Jan 18, 2010
    That's the actual definition of the consensus champion.
     
  8. Bert Cooper

    Bert Cooper Guest

    A better question is who is the best boxer in each weight division.
     
  9. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    Luckily this is all changing as the WBA, WBC, and IBF are going to join together to create a unified champion by 2016, whereby the beltholders will engage in a tournament to decide legit champion.
     
  10. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    And when the networks refuse to pay thier titlists their fees, or threaten to sue for breach of contract......how then do these tournaments get put together.

    I remember the whole S6, when Lucian Bute was the concensus Champion at 168. HBO had him under contract, which he promptly fulfilled to sign with Showtime. Showtime spent 2 mil/fight(and owe him a fight) only to have Dan G005EN boycott his entry as an alternate and instead letting 42 y/o Glen Johnson in instead.

    Now, Showtime is trying to do a LHW tourney, which will allow WARD in, since he's suing to get off HBO, and not allow the best LHW, KOvalev in.:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  11. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Thanks Robney. You've muddied the waters even further.

    I'll wait for the Interim Disputed Undisputed Regular Linear Champ as opposed to Consensus Interim Disputed Undisputed Regular Linear Champ, thank you very much.
     
  12. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    Say what?


    Speak more on this, friend.
     
  13. Robney

    Robney ᴻᴼ ᴸᴼᴻᴳᴲᴿ ᴲ۷ᴵᴸ Full Member

    92,923
    27,663
    Jan 18, 2010
    You're welcome! Always eager to help :good
     
  14. SimplyTheBest

    SimplyTheBest Heavyweight Destroyer Full Member

    10,415
    253
    Feb 3, 2010
    I remember him ducking the S6, hiding in Canada and getting brutally exposed when he finally stepped up to elite level. Only Butards ever had him as a "consensus" champion....champion of the Bell Centre.
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,734
    47,523
    Mar 21, 2007
    WBA you are drunk.

    Go home.