DeGale still managed by Frank

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Jul 26, 2012.


  1. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Quick mention in Boxing News that "following a hearing James DeGale remains under contract with manager Frank ****** until April 2013"

    However it says he can fight for another promoter........as long as Frank gets 25% of his purse :nut
     
  2. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    25%!

    Take his trainers, 10%, promoters cut, training fees, tax etc, what the **** would be the point in him even getting in there.
     
  3. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    You could ask most boxers that question using the same figures. Thats just how it is.
     
  4. bam bam

    bam bam Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,589
    0
    Mar 30, 2010
    Is that what is happening with Bellew?
     
  5. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    Thats true, but the 25% seems excessive for a manager?
     
  6. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Steady :yep
     
  7. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    7
    Mar 9, 2008
    Dunno if someone knows this or not but if Frank also promotes DeGale then does he take an extra % cut for that as well? So 25% plus whatever he is due as a promoter?
     
  8. pathmanc1986

    pathmanc1986 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,853
    5
    Oct 4, 2008
    Yup id say so

    Being a promoter / manager of one fighter is legal here but was made illegal under that Ali act in US. Conflict of interest.
     
  9. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    It's been said before but a fighter shouldn't have the same individual carrying out the promoter and manager's jobs.

    ''Hi Frank, it's Frank''.

    ''Hello Frank, how are you?''

    ''Great, thanks, you?''

    ''Yes, great. What can I do for you?''

    ''I've got an interesting fight for James Degale. It's for the European title, against a teak tough, never been stopped guy who can't punch.... interested?''

    ''Goes without saying, I'll run it by James first''

    [thinks to himself]

    ''I don't really need to, do I?''

    -------------------------------

    Disclaimer - I would like to make it perfectly clear that this post applies to all promoter manager relationships in boxing, not just concerning Mr ****** and his Clients.

    This isn't in any way meant in a defamatory manner.
     
  10. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    Not really mate. For years the standard BBBofC boxer/ manager contract was 25%, I'm pretty sure most are still pretty much the same.
     
  11. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    yes. Don King had an extra twist on this where he'd pay the all tax out of the boxers 100%, but then give himself and his son Carl the 33% and 25% tax free based on the original 100%.
     
  12. zabs

    zabs Member Full Member

    175
    0
    Apr 19, 2011
    Frank gave that tit like a million up front. So seems reaosnable to me.
     
  13. ai786

    ai786 Active Member Full Member

    1,444
    0
    Dec 13, 2009
    I think the 25% is for both Manager and Promoter deal. I remember reading it somewhere.
     
  14. iron_chin

    iron_chin Boxing Addict banned

    6,645
    0
    Jun 12, 2011
    thats a good deal in all fairness, ortiz manager was gettin 20% or something i read.
     
  15. thewinfella

    thewinfella The Golden Boy Full Member

    14,954
    0
    Jun 14, 2009
    If that figure (25%) has been calculated by a court or tribunal , that will be the total fee De Gale owes Frank in the eyes of the legal system (per fight , under another promotional outfit) , i imagine that will be it and no more , these things are decided on a) whats in the contract 1st and foremost , and b) whats morally right i.e. Franks involvement in the process of De Gale fighting under another banner , pretty comical actually being that it won't even be him dealing with it personally