Delahoya vs Whitaker Revisted !

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Imperial1, May 17, 2012.


  1. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    377
    Feb 10, 2009
    As I remember, I had it even going into the last round which Pea gave away, handing Oscar a razor-thin victory.

    Oscar landed some nice, hard shots and was the clear aggressor while Whitaker, at times, embarrassed him with his defence. Very close fight where Pea showed glimpses of his former greatness.
     
  2. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Yeah your right ..Didn't think about the draw ...It was such a tactical fight ..How much of Pernell's age showed in that fight ?
     
  3. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,566
    18,253
    Oct 7, 2006
    Whitaker showed incredible reflexes... He showed incredible speed, and a great chin.

    Oscar showed great speed, and showed to be more powerful and relentless.

    Whitaker was hesitant to open up because Oscar was a huge puncher.
     
  4. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    I really liked Oscar's movement in that fight ..The in and out ..He really was catching Pernell with some good shots ..Was surprised that he actually frustrated him ,thought it be the other way around ..
     
  5. benner

    benner Active Member Full Member

    982
    0
    Apr 22, 2012
    Didn't his eye start swelling after just one shot ?
    I thought that was the reason why Pernell was so passive.
     
  6. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011
    How does prime Floyd do against that version of Oscar? Personally I think Floyd wins a close decision.
     
  7. hoopsman

    hoopsman Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,555
    2,184
    Jul 24, 2005
    Great thread!

    I was just talking about this tilt the other night!

    Sweet Pea was certainly not shot by any means, but I don't think he was quite as fast and elusive as he had been.

    Nonetheless he made Oscar miss repeatedly.
     
  8. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007

    Personally he makes any fighter in the history of the sprot miss him at his best ..Wan't this dubbed best P4P at the time ??
     
  9. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Oscar at 147 is sheer size for he was a huge WW but he had a few distinctive problems of fading down the stretch prolly due to making weight and he was not as smart defensive or offensive. He would gladly trade as he did with Mosley and just swing wildly at times. Oscar late in WW/154 had more power and more developed right hand and better gas tank and also size but he is also older.

    To me I think Floyd would beat Oscar in any weight. Floyd was just a phenomenal boxer at any weight and adapted accordingly to box with his weight. Oscar was 33, was he at his physical peak? i doubt it but he is over the hill? Most definitely not. Experience trade from physical peak. Also in further his out of prime he had all the advantages to him being 160+ small ring and big glove which all going to cause problems for floyd being that he has never fought at 154, heavy gloves to slow and tire him out and small ring to take away his legs but Oscar still clearly lost 8-4. 9-3 if you give swing round to Floyd.

    Only weight I give Oscar a solid chance of beating Floyd was at 154. Anything below without advantage, Floyd will be too fast and skill and win even wider.
     
  10. king khan

    king khan Boxing Junkie banned

    10,733
    0
    Apr 9, 2012
    De La Hoya won. . . I know people try to sound like they're "in the know" by saying Whitaker was robbed. . . But he wasn't. . . Oscar won the fight. . It was close, but DLH won 7 rounds. . . He landed more power punches, and controlled the tempo of the fight.
     
  11. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    Floyd vs Oscar at 135 and 140 would be an amazing fight. I don't know who I would pick.
     
  12. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Floyd fought distinictly different above 140. His last resembling fight where he moved around like PBF was against Baldomir.

    I think At 135-140 Floyd will throughly embrass Oscar in a full size ring where he can maximize his legs. he used to fly all over the ring with leaping left hooks, throwing combos, and lead rights. PBF was a pure boxer/puncher and even more untouchable than now. Money is a calculating counter puncher with more developed defense where he smothers too.

    PBF > Money big time IMO.
     
  13. Peppermint

    Peppermint Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,014
    18
    Sep 7, 2010
    Whittaker COULD have won had he thrown more punches, but Oscar won imo and I dont see the contaversy.
     
  14. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,577
    3,768
    May 4, 2012
    Oscar was pretty fleet footed, was huge, and had an amazing jab. If Burton and ****ing Castillo could bug Floyd with their jabs Oscar's jab would **** him badly.
     
  15. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Oscar still had a jab when he fought floyd at 154 but did he win? castillo I floyd was injured. Burton was awkward. I think He caught Floyd by surprise tbh. Oscar may can get success with his jab but Floyd will have success doing what he wants too.

    Oscar will have a lot more to worry about than Vice versa imo.

    FLoyd is not going to lose just bc of a jab. Floyd will do what he usually does and adapt. Plus he is not bad at shooting his rights over jabs too which usually discourages fighters from abusing the jab. Floyd can hit Oscar with basically anything while Oscar really have one punch that finds success on floyd. Now factor that with Floyd's speed at 135-140 will pull the fight much further from Oscar.