delete

Spot on. Why have an undercard, when you can have an overcard? I just don't get it :?

 

Urge to commit fratricide...rising...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNq2oap_W9s

 

:izzl
http://youtu.be/Uh7l8dx-h8M

 

This is ban worthy, right?
Because it absolutely takes the cake.

 

Personally, i like watching young unknown fighters, learning more about them and watching them develop as fighters, fight by fight.

 

Wilder would have a record of 1-0 ( 0 % KO's)

I think you should at least have to fight one live body before you can have a title shot. FFS even Bermane was sick as hell and should of been in the hospital instead of trying to fight. If you are p!ssing up wasted muscle tissue in your urine you ought not to take any fight.

 

Ah, only in a perfect world. You would think by putting killer undercards that rivaled the main event itself would greatly help in selling the ppv and it would, but the problem would be paying the stars themselves. I think you might get away having 2 huge stars in the same ppv, but if you have stars in just about every undercard, which can be half a dozen, not sure if there'd be much profit for the promoters.

 

They should keep the sh!t fighters off television.

99% of the fighters on TV are sh!t.
And that gives boxing a bad image.

You know, in most other professions, you have to be pretty f**king good or remarkable in some way to get on television.

Like even baking cakes and stuff, unless it's some stupid game-show where they have amateurs "trying to bake cakes" but they always tell you that and make it obvious that these are not even journeyman-level and it's a bit of a joke. If some guy can't bake a cake they say "this guy's a c*unt, his cake baking effort's a f**king shambles !"

Whereas, with boxing, some guy who can't box or fight AT ALL, gets in the ring - LIVE ON TELEVISION - puts on a pathetic impersonation of a boxer, truly awful ... and all the presenters pretend he's a real boxer. :huh
What's worse, the governing bodies invent some rankings or titles and make these guys world champions or #1 ranked contenders.
And the promoters pay them loads of money.
Instead of just saying, "go home, you c*unt, come back when you can fight. Or maybe try something else, like baking cakes for a living"

 

There's probably a special channel for that.

 

People would get tired of seeing the same fighters fight each other over and over, and because only the stars fought, there'd be no way for up-and-coming fighters to become stars. If only the stars fight, the up-and-coming talent wouldn't have the opportunity to become stars to replace the old ones.

 

I've been thinking boxing should switch to more of a bullfighting approach.

For example, instead of May vs. Pac, they should just have Mayweather fight Deontay Wilder. But they couldn't just have them duke it out, because Mayweather is obviously too small.

So what they could do is put them in a giant boxing ring, similar to a bullring, so that Mayweather wouldn't get trapped on the ropes. And then before Mayweather takes the stage, they could have guys like Rigo, Santa Cruz, Lomachenko play the role of picadores, and they'd all fight Wilder at once for about five rounds.

So they'd basically **** off and tire out Wilder, and then by round 6 they'd leave and Mayweather would enter. Wilder would have no gameplan at that point and just charge at Mayweather, who would sidestep his way to a unanimous decision.

Oh, and in the week leading up to the fight they run a bunch of second rate heavyweights like Shannon Briggs and Frankie Gavern through the streets while fans threw tomatoes at them.